Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Dan Morgan hire cause you to financially invest in the team (renew tickets)?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

We are going to s..k as long as Mr. And Mrs T are around and it's even going to be hard for me to be happy when we win any games. The little flick of the wrist, with the water,showed me all I needed to know. And coach Wilks saying he really didn't like him. I have come to the conclusion that we were bought by the wrong person and he will have to move them. No one is going to support them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

For me it’s a RESOUNDING NO

no merch

no PSL renewal

nothing

 

you don’t hire an extensive search firm to hire the guy who was part of drafting Bryce Young. This just tells me that the search firm and all that was window dressing, Tepper has not changed one bit

 

 how can we as fans respond?

 

skip the March on Mint nonsense

 

 just don’t spend money on the team, no merchandise, no tickets. Just watch the circus from home or watch red zone 

No

i have one year left on contract.  I’m  finished …trying to move this last year

i have great seats in the shade and a lot 1 parking pass   I hate giving them up

but it’s over for me 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

No

i have one year left on contract.  I’m  finished …trying to move this last year

i have great seats in the shade and a lot 1 parking pass   I hate giving them up

but it’s over for me 

You've been saying this for 10 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tbe said:


It makes perfect sense if Dan is all you could get.

Tepper got a fuging outside consulting firm for the GM search and they were probably like "uh no one wants this job sorry" lol. Either that or Morgan was the only one to guarantee he won't give Bryce Young any competition

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Tepper got a fuging outside consulting firm for the GM search and they were probably like "uh no one wants this job sorry" lol. Either that or Morgan was the only one to guarantee he won't give Bryce Young any competition


pretty much

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s already happened, and it’s going to get worse. The Panthers are going to miss out on capturing an entire generation of Panthers fans. It’s incredible how little interest I see in the team compared to just 8 or 9 years ago. Having Cam was a huge boost to the fan base and brought a lot of kids to become Panthers fans. Now? They are missing out on getting a new crop of kids to become Panthers fans.

I moved back to NC after living in TX 13 years and after talking to some other dads in my new neighborhood, they all say their kids do not care about the Panthers and some didn’t even know the Panthers existed. Some dads say they have tried to make their kids Panthers fans to no success and others say they’ve tried to actively NOT let their kids become fans by not watching games and renouncing their own fandom. A older couple lives across the street from me who are big college basketball fans and I asked them if they are Panthers fans. They said “used to be!” and mentioned how disappointing it’s been lately. One clear consistency across all these people I talked to was they are all fed up with David Tepper and think has done a horrendous job. 

I am not sure if Tepper knows how deep the damage he has done to the fanbase goes. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

No but I was more looking to see if the owner learned/changing

 

all he did was put lipstick on a pig by hiring a search firm and just signing Morgan. 

Last GM hire he went out of house and hired what many thought was a rising star from a successful organization. How’d that work out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...