Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints Game Day Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

Canales needs to put Dalton in....If our dipshit owner doesn't agree and you get your walking papers for not being able to cram the half pint pinto down our throats...oh well...

No

That's the same thing as when we fired Rhule and I said it was a mistake to do it at the time, because it only would improve the team.

We're not contending this year, just take our lumps and get a good draft pick.  No point in playing Dalton so we can be a 6-11 team and end up in no man's land in the draft where we won't get a truly elite prospect.

Bryce needs to be our starter for the full season and possibly even next year as well since this is a weak QB class.  Draft a non QB elite prospect, spend another year building up young talent, suck again next year with Bryce and then draft someone like Arch Manning with the 1st pick in 2026.

We're garbage right now, need to just embrace the pain and build it up right as opposed to trying for the quick fix yet again, as it never works.  Look at the Lions, they built it up right instead of trying to find shortcuts to win faster, that's how you need to do it when you're THIS bad

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Oh they'll just hide or pretend they never said those things. Just like they swore up and down others would do.

So true. They are playing exactly as I expected they would. I don’t like being negative but all the we might be .500/sneak into the playoff guys were naive. We are in hell until we get a QB. Our QB sucks donkey balls even when he doesn’t have pressure and can get out of the pocket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...