Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You cannot start Bryce Young again. He is not an NFL player.


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

He was one of the smallest prospects ever. They kept talking about his intangibles. Yeh ok, But you also need physical tools to be successful too. He has no real accuracy. He has trouble seeing the field from the pocket it seems like. He has no arm strength. The issue is that everything else around him has to be near perfect for him to have a productive play or drive. But how often does that happen for this team? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Xtreme said:

See, I don't get that. They fired our last HC after one season. No one is safe. If they care about job security, they need to bench Young. 

Young was Tepper’s decision.  He overruled the football people.  Dumping the dumpling would mean Tepper was wrong. (Omg! No!!) That’s why the little feller gets to play dress up as a QB1 on Sundays.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fan engagement is going to go through the floor if he is put out there every week. It will be bad no matter who plays because we will likely lose every game, but at least the other options might actually make some plays to get you excited.


At this point I'm actually shocked if Bryce makes a completion. You can guarantee any down field attempt is going to be out of bounds or an overthrow.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think that Bryce Young is the worst starting quarterback in the NFL and should not be starting. However, you have to let him start the rest of the games so that he will either,

a. Continue to suck and get us the number one pick.


b. Improve as he goes on and gain confidence to prove himself as a quarterback.

Either of these scenarios would be in the Panthers benefit if one of those were to happen.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they didn’t bring in another young QB prospect to compete with Young you knew it was over. It’s like they played Plummer all pre season because they knew he was garbage and would make Bryce look better.

Dan Morgan is just another Tepper yes man collecting a check. You’re not convincing anyone that Young and Plummer are “dogs”

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I said that last year, but the Huddle opted to develop Bryce over being competitive and winning some games.  On the bright side, we now know Bryce is trash too.  Nothing further to develop and time to cut bait.  Oh boy, only 17 more weeks of Panthers misery.  Hooray!!!!

It will take more then 17 weeks to fix this team....Bryce is the biggest problem, but the defense sucks too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...