Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Andy Dalton will 'get another crack' as starting QB

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hopefully the damn plan is to trade bryce, sign a vet, draft a young guy and for fugs sake let him sit for 8, 10 17 games. 

Yes. Something to be said about letting a QB watch and learn.  At the very least make him prove he is better than a 37 year old journeyman before anointing him starter I know in the current sate it’s not the norm but the current state isn’t working for the Panthers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
countryboi Veteran

countryboi

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Yes. Something to be said about letting a QB watch and learn.  At the very least make him prove he is better than a 37 year old journeyman before anointing him starter I know in the current sate it’s not the norm but the current state isn’t working for the Panthers. 

No one has time for that these coaches and GM’s jobs are on the line. Fan don’t even wants wait on Bryce to develop and yall telling me that you’re willing to wait another year or two for the next guy?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, countryboi said:

No one has time for that these coaches and GM’s jobs are on the line. Fan don’t even wants wait on Bryce to develop and yall telling me that you’re willing to wait another year or two for the next guy?

 

Don't act like THAT is what would be setting us back. Bryce is what set us back; let's get out from under that. Sooner the better.

38 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Smh

SMH harder

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Your honest assessment, what do you think a team would be crazy enough to give up for Bryce? That's saying if one believes they can "fix" him. 

5th rounder, maybe 4rth if we get lucky

 

The tape on him is simply not good.  He is a game manager back up incapable of putting a team on his back to win. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

Water makes things wet?

While I think we've seen some good stuff from Bryce, he's not looked like a No. 1 overall stud of a pick.  Bryce will have to be really good.  We've seen that...once?  Versus Green Bay last year?  Is it a matter of the play calling keeping Bryce hemmed in this season?   Or just him?  I'm not sure anymore.  

I mean, he's "looked" better, but compared to how he was playing, HOW much better is that?  This is at a time when a LOT of young QBs are struggling.  Playing QB in the NFL is hard, especially when defenses are set up to force you to go 8-12 plays each drive.  But that's why Bryce was drafted - he had the ability to play the mental chess versus opponents.  He's going to get a chance again, but if he looks overwhelmed again, back to Dalton.

So basically - if Bryce keeps the good play rolling, Canales has to keep the franchise defining trade in.  Even if it's barely good.  If Bryce comes out and turns the ball over 3x in three drives...then I think you have to pull him at that point.

Way to really go out on a limb Joe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...