Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So what is your draft strategy after today?


Panthero
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I’m still taking Graham if he’s there.

How many DT’s do we need? We already have D Brown, Wharton, Bobby Brown, A Robinson, Tuttle, Ray all under contract. That would be a poor allocation of resources with how many other holes we have. That’s a lot of $$ on the sideline watching. 

Edited by flagfootballcoach28
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine has never changed, T-Mac no matter what.

I also just don't get the love affair with Walker, especially at 8.

He's more MLB than Edge right now and he's no Kuechly.  He's not going to make an immediate significant pass rush improvement in year 1, if he's going to turn into an elite edge rusher, it's going to take him a few years to bulk up and just play more (he basically only has 1 year of playing time in college).

He's a low floor, high ceiling, raw prospect, which I'm not against taking in general, but I'd like them to have more of a true position, or at least, be more of an Edge than a MLB, not the other way around.

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wharton DT: ranked in lower half of league in run d; 6.5 sacks last year.

Jackson CB: good pairing w/ JC Horn.

Moehrin S: second on team w/ 104 tackles.

Jones LB: 7 sacks last year with only one start so he can get to the qb.

Brown DT: will fit the D nicely as a nose that can eat up blocks and stop the run.

Tremble: hoping he continues to improve as a pass catcher.

Corbett: bring back the oline that helped Bryce.

Man we opened up our options in this draft. Obviously still need a lot of help but it doesn't feel quite as desperate. I might have to change my opinion on Tet.  Still wouldn't mind a trade back scenario.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...