Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1 - Panthers Select Tetairoa McMillan at Pick 8


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have no concerns about Tet's skills, and the Huddle would have said all these same things about drafting Mike Evans. My only concern is what we're going to do about our historically bad defense. Signing a couple DTs doesn't fix it.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a vote of no confidence in XL. 

Tet has something that XL seemed to struggle with, and in fact most of our receivers room struggled with (besides Coker) and that's SURE HANDS. McMillan is big and catches like it's his nature. I think he'll be a great weapon for Bryce. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the plus I see is Bryce being the VET amonst young rookies.  He gets to be the leader.  VET WR's will try to dictate what they want, when they want it.  Good for Bryce to grow this way instead of trying to fulfill VET WR demands.  It's put up or shut up time for Bryce.

Edited by chknwing
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rodeo said:

I have no concerns about Tet's skills, and the Huddle would have said all these same things about drafting Mike Evans. My only concern is what we're going to do about our historically bad defense. Signing a couple DTs doesn't fix it.

Okay, but we didn't, we loved Evans and prayed for him to fall to us until it was apparent it wouldn't happen.

Also, this forum has been way better at rating draft prospects than the front office since Tepper has been at the helm.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

I have no concerns about Tet's skills, and the Huddle would have said all these same things about drafting Mike Evans. My only concern is what we're going to do about our historically bad defense. Signing a couple DTs doesn't fix it.

Tyleik Williams would be nice.

Ez would be good at edge.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...