Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: if Lawrence is gone, what's the plan then?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

First off.. putting the cart before the horse, you just can't play a rookie behind this Oline no matter who it us. That is the biggest problem to solve first. If they some how do a fix by 2021 then what's plan b if they don't get their QB? Keep Bridgewater and draft 2nd best rookie QB? Don't think anyone currently on this roster is starting quality....

What you got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fields then Lance. 
 

In my opinion we have to take one of the three of those guys even if it means mortgaging future picks. 
 

You have to use some cap to add free agent pieces in the secondary and a good linebacker. 
 

You draft oline in the 2nd and 3rd round. 
 

you roll teddy out there early next year and let the qb learn and then hopefully take over a few games in. 
 

then you ideally compete in 2022 (same time frame as the cardinals are seeing with Murray, the ravens saw with Lamar, and the bills saw with Allen). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lawrence is my preferred choice, I think he's got the highest floor and highest ceiling and is pro ready, but Fields' and Lance's floor and ceiling aren't that much lower than Lawrence's, and they'd be great consolation prizes. Outside of those 3 though, I have zero fuging clue what we would do at QB for the future...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a great guy but a horrible reporter. He makes my skin crawl when I hear his name. I heard that babies cry and dogs attack him when he enters a room. Other than that he is a good dude. Now go burn in hades u sum bit. 
    • The job just really passed him by. He came up when basically you just needed to get three or four quotes, toss a couple of team provided stats in there, and stretch it out to column length. you got your copy in by 330, out the door by 4, then chill/shmooze the rest of the day. If you were really good you got a book deal. Every now and then you got to write an editorial. The goal of the profession was like Peter King where ostensibly you’re a beat writer for whomever but you get paid to just shoot the poo. now it’s a 24 hour job, you’ve gotta be social media savvy, the pace has increased substantially, you’re expected to produce more than ever, you gotta be able to look through bullshit etc. there’s still risk of industry capture where you just become a mouth piece. Sheena Quick is obviously shameless. I don’t think Newton ever aspired to be more than an inoffensive beat writer, but even that relatively simple role was just more than he was cut out for. its even worse when you’re covering a team that expects the Fourth Estate to act as a PR extension, or considers them on par with buying Twitter bots to promote Bryce. there were over thirty papers that covered the panthers first training camp. In that environment there’s room for boring guys like newton, and they may even be incentivized to push the boundary a little. But today that just isn’t the case and most of the guys are hanging on until retirement (person, gantt) or they’re good and gonna be matched up like Jordan. im not defending the current state of sports journalism, just saying that what counts as a meat and potatoes beat writer passed newton by. He’s retiring well past his sell by date, but that’s pretty common for his generation in general. 
×
×
  • Create New...