Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Keep Davis or make Smith the #2 RB


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Mike Davis had a decent year and may be of value to some teams. Rodney Smith looked good ( when he got a shot) and would be less $$. Would you let Davis walk and make Smith the #2? If CMC can't stay healthy next year do you have faith in Smith to carry the load?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone would love to keep Davis including the staff, but he has played well enough that we won’t be able to afford him. Rhule really seems to like getting young players and developing them, and  I am willing to bet that the analytics show it’s not smart to tie up that much money in the RB position with what we are paying CMC. I’d rather use that money to retain Moton. With all The holes we still must fill, along with rebuilding the O line, Davis seems to be all but gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Priority in my opinion needs to be making damn sure we keep Moton and Samuel. Davis is likely the odd man out in this situation. CMC should return healthy next year and our RB by committee did an above average job this season all things considered so I think you could let Davis walk and feel comfortable about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Mike Davis had a decent year and may be of value to some teams. Rodney Smith looked good ( when he got a shot) and would be less $$. Would you let Davis walk and make Smith the #2? If CMC can't stay healthy next year do you have faith in Smith to carry the load?

Neither, ideally. Davis was very solid but we shouldn't pay what we'd need to to keep him. Either draft a RB on day 3 to be backup, sign a lower tier one in FA, or worst case stick with Smith/Bonnafon, etc. but we really shouldn't invest that much more in the position than we already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep, let Davis walk. 

Davis is a reminder that in a decent offensive scheme.....productive RB play isn't that hard to find.   Don't need to waste money on CMC's backup.  That should be a position made up of draft type players and cheap FAs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Mike Davis had a decent year and may be of value to some teams. Rodney Smith looked good ( when he got a shot) and would be less $$. Would you let Davis walk and make Smith the #2? If CMC can't stay healthy next year do you have faith in Smith to carry the load?

Didn't we put Bonnafan on IR.  I think he is a better option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who thinks Davis is going to cost alot doesn't know alot about how the NFL values running backs anymore.  Davis had a 3 million cap hit in 2020.  At 28, before next year starts, he won't get that much from his next contract.  You could probably bring him back for around 2 million.  But if getting younger on offense is your goal, bringing back a 28 year old running back probably is not the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
    • Shannon was sued for $50 million (settled out of court, I believe) for forcing sex on his girlfriend during a two-year relationship.  He denies it, but ESPN let him go last April.  Chad Johnson's wife filed a police report because he head-butted her in a car and was put on probation. I had to google it.  I watched the Ray Rice video and when you see it, you realize just how vile and cowardly abusing a woman really is.  But for the same point Aussie tried to make, these women are defenseless, and being phyiscally bigger and stronger does not validate your actions.   I can't even stand to watch Steve Smith.  I can't normalize this kind of behavior--again, I do not think R-P had that in mind when he posted this.  When the reason was exposed, we should realize that we are talking life (quality of) and death (in some cases) here.  
    • I can respect the fact that we should not glorify or normalize men who have a history of beating women.  I do not think anyone was thinking of that when they posted this, but if head-butting your wife and unconsensual sex (rape) is something you cannot overlook, I agree with that.  I think they are both half-crazed attention hounds regardless of their pasts.  
×
×
  • Create New...