Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule's QBs troughout his coaching career


JABANOG
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

That's pretty a pretty bold statement only because of Newton's MVP and Super Bowl Appearance. He'll have to win a lot of shootouts in the AFC, but It's not like it isn't possible. I think he'll have a solid career, but not sure if I see the kid winning any MVP's. Time will tell. Definitely gonna be exciting if most of the QB's in this class pan out. Probably won't be excitement in here though. 

Newton .5 is Justin Fields - it's the only reason I can point to as to why so many on here are in love with him. 

He kinda reminds them of a watered down version of Newton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Newton .5 is Justin Fields - it's the only reason I can point to as to why so many on here are in love with him. 

He kinda reminds them of a watered down version of Newton. 

I personally don't see a comparison between the two. I mean other than race lol. I also don't think we got to see the best Newton we possibly could have. Not saying we didn't do anything for him, but we could have done a lot more for the man. Guess that's why we don't have the same FO today as we did in the Cam era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall it was Rivera that played Cam while he was hurt and it was Hurnia that threw Cam out like leftovers .  Rhule had stated that would like to coach Cam but was not given the opportunity .  Fitts did not want to give up all our draft capital for a rookie QB .  Darnald may not be the answer but at least he has some experience and has talent .  Lets see how he does before throwing Rhule under the bus .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I genuinely don't see Fox or Rivera rebuilding two college programmes - one that was burnt down to the foundations.

They're not that guy. They can take a poor team and make it mediocre (with the odd good season sprinkled in there). They're not programme builders - Rhule is. In both cases in college he was poached by a bigger organisation before he could truly reap the benefits of what he was sowing. 

Well, they aren’t college coaches.  I wasn’t alluding to them being able to go college.   

But Ron and Fox are the NFL variant IMO.  You could give them the worst team in the NFL.  Give them 3-4 years.  And it would be respectable IMO.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Newton .5 is Justin Fields - it's the only reason I can point to as to why so many on here are in love with him. 

He kinda reminds them of a watered down version of Newton. 

It was the Clemson game that really sold me on Fields. He took a big shot, and wasn't 100% after it. But despite that, he gutted out the game and got his team the W.  That night, I said the kid was going to be a good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, they aren’t college coaches.  I wasn’t alluding to them being able to go college.   

But Ron and Fox are the NFL variant IMO.  
You could give them the worst team in the NFL.  Give them 4 years.  And it would be respectable IMO.   
 

 

A skosh over .500 is respectable, I guess. Those "play not to lose/defensive" HCs typically beat the bad teams, lose to the good ones and have anomaly seasons where their talent takes them farther. Rhule seems way more adaptive than either of those two.

Edited by Khaki Lackey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

A skosh over .500 is respectable, I guess. Those "play not to lose/defensive" HCs typically beat the bad teams, lose to the good ones and have anomaly seasons where their talent takes them farther. Rhule seems way more adaptive than either of those two.

Doesn’t the bolded largely apply to all 3 though?   Would that not describe Rhule’s overall college experience? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JABANOG said:

Temple

13-16 PJ Walker

Baylor

17 Zach Smith/ Charlie Brewer 

18-19 Charlie Brewer 

Panthers

20 Teddy/PJ/Will

21 Darnold/PJ/Will

 

Yea this man shouldn't be making the QB decisions even with full roster control it seems he's never even had an AVERAGE QB 

Lame, really Lame.

College replace coaches because their current team sucks.  Top level HS QBs aren't going to go to a program that doesn't give them the best opportunity to succeed.  The rare exception is a hometown star that wants to play locally.  

To Rhule's credit he built both programs from the ground up.

2020 was Brady if you ask me.  I think he wanted Bridgewater since he had some success with him in New Orleans.  Made sense.

Darnold was Rhule and Fitterer.  So we'll see.

What really chaps my ass is the multitude of posters, like you, that want to just post negative threads.  It's one thing to post a negative thread with valid points but to reach on a topic like this one is very lame.

If you don't like the Panther's good or bad. Go join another fan base and spread your hate there. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...