Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How would you feel if ..


Dory
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, The Huddler said:

sorry Howell is over rated by UNC homers

 

dude had several NFL players on his offense in 2020 and didnt do poo

 

played in the ACC and was underwleming

 

hes also got the game body as baker mayfield..  just pastier, and harrier  

 

Compare Trevor Lawrence’s stats to Howell’s and then re-assess why you believe Howell was underwhelming. Unless, of course, you didn’t think Lawrence was the golden child QB prospect in college. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Shocker said:

Not enough to get up to 26…we would have trade next years 1 and more

A trade down first grabbing  Cross who would need to fall and then have Howell fall to round 2 would be nice.  Won’t happen IMO but I can dream

Next years first is going to be a top 5 pick so hell no trading next years first to move back up.  That would be incredibly dumb

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ThPantherFan said:

Honestly, I'd rather trade players for picks, and that's what I think we'll ultimately do if the expectation is to be competitive in 2022.

This would not surprise me. But who besides CMC? Could Burns, DJ, Gross-Matos or Brown be on the block? I think Burns is actually the most likely. He was a Pro-Bowler. He is young. If we resign Reddick and Keep Haynes he may be viewed as the most expendable player that could result in a decent return of draft capital.

But if we are willing to trade a player like Burns (or the others)...what's to keep Rhule and Fit from trading instead for Cousins, Carr, or Jimmy G. Can you imagine those teams with Burns coming off the edge combined with the weapons they already have.....

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Dory said:

We stick at 6 and take the best OT (Cross, Ekwonu, Neal)

We trade back into the first round *Pick 26* to get Sam Howell, and give up a 2nd and 3rd next year in the process.

Would you do it?

Don't want Howell, I'm a pass on a QB from a basketball school, he's not impressive to me. From what I can see he's solid / good, but no ''elite'' trait that stands out to me. Seems like a high floor / low ceiling QB. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dory said:

We stick at 6 and take the best OT (Cross, Ekwonu, Neal)

We trade back into the first round *Pick 26* to get Sam Howell, and give up a 2nd and 3rd next year in the process.

Would you do it?

that is no where close to being the approriate future picks to get this year's pick 26.

2022 NFL Trade Value Chart (drafttek.com)

rough numbers here but next years pick are generally valued as this years pick's but one round later.

2nd and 3rd next year would be around a 3rd and 4th this year.  

So,

pick 26 this year = 700

For

Round 2 next year would be like Round 3 this year = 190

Round 3 next year would be like round 4 this year =70

700 vs 260? not happening

 

More realistic 

pick 26 this year = 700

For

Round 1 next year would be like round 2 this year = 420

Round 2 next year would be like round 3 this year = 190

Round 4 this year = 104

700 vs 714

So a more realistic trade would be pick 26 this year for our 2022 4th, 2023 1st, and 2023 2nd.

Also I usually take pick 16 of each round in future years because it is a midpoint pick. I fully realize that a future 1st rounder from us is worth more than say the KC Chiefs but the midpoint is a good starting point.  Teams might adjust slightly depending on hwo bad or good they think you are.  A team is never going to give you full value expecting you to have a top 3 pick.  What if you get lucky and win 7 to 9 games, all of sudden you might be picking around 12.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

Compare Trevor Lawrence’s stats to Howell’s and then re-assess why you believe Howell was underwhelming. Unless, of course, you didn’t think Lawrence was the golden child QB prospect in college. 

it aint about stats.  Howell didnt win a damn thing. If he cant elevate his college team in the ACC he wont elevate the panthers in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Shocker said:

Not enough to get up to 26…we would have trade next years 1 and more

A trade down first grabbing  Cross who would need to fall and then have Howell fall to round 2 would be nice.  Won’t happen IMO but I can dream

A first and second rounder is not enough to move up to 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

it aint about stats.  Howell didnt win a damn thing. If he cant elevate his college team in the ACC he wont elevate the panthers in the NFL

There is something to say about talent level of your team, particularly in college. Just saying. Clemson, though not Bama or my alma mater, is going to have markedly more talent than UNC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

A first and second rounder is not enough to move up to 6.

Its pretty apparent to me after reading all of the "trade back" folk's post that they dont comprehend the tru value of having a pick this high in the draft.  Its gold.  Its a chance to get an elite elite player if we dont fug it up (which we most certainly will do)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

A first and second rounder is not enough to move up to 6.

Yeah I was just stating that a move down could net us a second (and more as you stated) but we would need a QB we like to drop to round 2 with the limited ammo we have in this draft.  I don’t want to touch next years picks in any move back up from round 2 type scenario.

I am thinking we almost have to come out of this draft with a top OL.  We can’t put this off anymore 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
    • Sounds like Veesaar is entering the draft. He could always test the waters and pull out and return but without him our big men look like a serious liability. Better do something in the portal. If they don't do something about this portal madness my days as a college sports fan are probably numbered. This bullshit of having a nearly entirely new team every season is gonna get old fast.
×
×
  • Create New...