Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why all the restructuring?


Michael G
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

It actually did.  His downfall was for reasons outside of that.

It didn't produce any titles. But I admit as bad as they are we seem to be trying to unseat them for the worst ran team. We seem to be trying to immulate the worst teams in the NFL.  I would say the goal has been achieved. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Armstead is choices 1,2,&3 for me. Wanted him for months.

I think hes going to get P-A-I-D, vastly over......so Im on the Trent Brown hopium......should be much cheaper give his struggles away for NE...but thats the best hope for me..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Michael G said:

So far we have restructured Moton and Thompson to free up money for this year, but we will have to pay those guys "huge stacks" over the next couple of years. My question is Why?

- Are we freeing up space to cover the costs of an elite or at least expensive QB? (Cousins? Wilson? Rodgers? Watson?)

- Does it mean we are going to go after a FA tackle like Armstead? and then draft a signal caller?

I'd think it'd be my second proposal because otherwise our Cap will be difficult to manage for the next coaches if/when this coming year results in another losing season.

What does everything think about the restructures and possible goals they would indicate. Debate Away!

 

99% chance we are freeing up money to upgrade the o-line. 1% chance we're going to trade for Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PantherFanInPhilly said:

Yall gonna be feeling real stupid when we win the Super Bowl with Jimeis Garoppocousins.

Wait? What? Did Jamis Winston,  Jimmy garapolo, and kirk cousins have a baby? 🤔

Edited by Geronimo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

So in a loaded tackle draft that we are sitting at pick 6 we throw a ton of cap at an aging FA tackle.  Makes sense.

Ask the 49er's if they regret giving Trent Williams a monster contract. The guy has only played 2 full seasons in his 11 year career. Williams was one of the main reasons San Fran was able to make it to the NFCCG with Jimmy G under center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...