Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Watson Thread - Part Deux


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So either way the Browns prob burned the Mayfield bridge today. Wonder if Matt Ryan is feeling this diva rn

Oh you know Matt Ryan is exercising his NTC and giving a big fug you to DW with a pleasant get off of my  fuging field to boot.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

They are professionals and “this is a business” is preached to them from day one lol. They’ll be fine. 

There’s a reason you put “this is a business” in quotations, because that is all it is:  a quote. Anyone who has spent any period of time working for someone knows that “this is a business” doesn’t fly when you’ve poured your heart and soul into something. 
 

These dudes are human beings that are asked to risk life and limb to entertain the masses and get paid handsomely to do so. Make no mistake though, this isn’t something that they just sweep under the run and say “so what” about. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Shocker said:

No he isn’t a lame duck OC.  Stupid take from an idiot 

You have no knowledge about anything that is close to even stupid 

Matt Rhule is gone this year unless he does something.   Seat so hot Tepper won’t even speak out of embarrassment of this clown show. 

McAdoo is a rental OC tied to our college clown HC.  

Plenty of NFL front offices have been sourced by reporters for speaking on what we currently are.   

if Matt Rhule was coaching a different team you would call him a dweeb version of trash Schiano.  That needs to go back to college.  Experiment should be over.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will get pooed for this all day and I DON'T CARE....GO SAINTS or GO FALCONS!  I don't want this scumbag on our roster.  Again I find it ironic the moral indignation of the same people that trampled Jerry Richardson for 'Jeans Friday' and a 'wide nose' welcoming...with open arms, a rapist.  He says it was consentual, but she doesn't...hmmmm. Seems a bit different than facial features or fashion style, no??  Fugg'n hypocrites...

Edited by 45catfan
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigdog10 said:

There’s a reason you put “this is a business” in quotations, because that is all it is:  a quote. Anyone who has spent any period of time working for someone knows that “this is a business” doesn’t fly when you’ve poured your heart and soul into something. 
 

These dudes are human beings that are asked to risk life and limb to entertain the masses and get paid handsomely to do so. Make no mistake though, this isn’t something that they just sweep under the run and say “so what” about. 

cool story dude 

these guys are paid millions to do a job that could require them to be traded. it’s all in the contract that they willingly signed. I’m sure it’s frustrating to be told you’re being traded, but players aren’t going to hold grudges for being potential trade fodder lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fuging hate the saints so damn much. Its nothing that team wont do to screw us over and it seems like its something every year. They hear we are interested in a player and next the rumors are flying they are doing everything to jump in front of us no matter what type of situation they are in. Its seriously irritating...bein honest the early stages in this i never thought they would be a team to jump in this watson race. But now i know you can never put anything past them. I seriously hope this crashes a burns for them if they beat us out. fug that team.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...