Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kenny Pickett Pro Day today


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, t96 said:

I still can't believe we drafted a long snapper with a 6th round pick.

I under the reasoning because Jason was up to retire and this kid is supposed to be the best coming out in a very long time. I do not understand wasting a pick on him though. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

I’m not crazy about Pickett and I don’t hate him either. I’ve only watched his highlights and he makes a lot of NFL throws. I see him tend to under throw the ball a lot and that’s in his highlights… I do feel he’s comparable to Mac Jones in terms of being the most NFL ready prospect at QB, but doesn’t have near the physical talent of say, Willis or Fields.

At this point we have to take a chance on a QB so I’m down for Pickett, Willis, or Corral. 

One thing I’ll say from watching his highlights is number 3 at WR is legit on Pitts team. I won’t be surprised if he’s a 1st rounder next year. 


 

Pickett is basically Mac Jones 2.0. A little less polished but a bit more upside with a slightly stronger arm and significantly more mobility. Basically, not a guy who is an ideal franchise QB and if you go with him he's probably good enough that you are winning games and with a good all around team getting in the playoffs, but I don't see him leading a team to a Super Bowl victory. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, davos said:

If we pick him I would love to think we’ve all been joking about a kid that can ball for us minus his limitations (which aren’t just hand size)

Ok, what are in other limitations in your opinion? I usually hear arm strength but that's good and good is not a limitation. I also hear fumbles but he only had 3 last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one good thing I can say about Pickett is that it shouldn't take the NFL more than a season or two to figure out what he is.  He's seen as fairly close to a completed player.  If we were to draft him, we wouldn't be another 3 years wondering if he's going to come good (I'm looking at you Malik Willis).  We would be able to make that determination quickly and either move on from him or continue building around him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, t96 said:

I still can't believe we drafted a long snapper with a 6th round pick.

its a 6th round pick. haha. Who knows, after jansen retires, we may have another 15 year long snapper. NFL.com  actually had an article earlier this month about the importance a long time running franchise long snapper. It wasnt satire either. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I struggle with the fact that he is a four year starter that was mediocre for three years and then great for one year. Other QBs that have had a great year and then get drafted didn’t have three bad years before that, it was more a case of them not getting the chance. He got the chance but showed very little. Yes maybe the light finally came on, but I’m not sure how I feel about it coming on in year four. I also don’t feel there is much upside to him, he is who he is, and not a top 10 pick. But I’m far from a QB expert.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

And Burrow has what? Half an inch on him?

1/2" is a fair amount relative to hand size.  It's a concern of mine but not the only.  

And yes, Burrow doesn't wear gloves, his hands are larger, and was sacked a bagillion times with not a ton of fumbles.  He's proven it to be a non-issue for him.

But it could be a problem for Pickett just like it was for Vick, I just think it could be given he wants to wear gloves.  The threshold was always 9.5 for many coaches with some accepting 9.  This is well below and it makes me genuinely curious how he does without gloves and an upsized ball.  I'll gladly shut up if it doesn't seem to be a problem for him but hate the fact he has to wear mits and when he didn't at a slippery senior bowl practice, had slipsies with snaps and no zip.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will begin with I'm not sure how I feel about Pickett.  Every qb in this class has strengths and question marks.   One or two will most likely end up being good qbs, but which ones seems like anybody's guess.  The thing I do find funny is how people keep randomly saying Pickett's athleticism is a liability.   Here are his numbers compared to a qb most people on here think is especially athletic.

FNAsCuIXoAUYVK8.png

patrick-mahomes-ras-14701.png

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...