Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule says giving CMC fewer reps at RB diminishes his value


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I mean I kind of get what Rhule is saying here. CMC just being on the field gives the defense so much more to worry about, whether that's as a runner or as a receiver.

They can have him on the field a lot without running him into the ground. Even as a decoy on any given play he still is extremely valuable.

Whether they go that route remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won’t make it a full season if they run him like they have been.

I like the foreman signing. He was a good spell back for king Henry last year and is competent running and catching out of the backfield. If they aren’t gonna use cmc in the slot more than I hope they split reps between the 2 backs more. I think chuba is just a jag. Maybe chuba takes a jump this upcoming season idk. But right now foreman has better playmaking ability imo.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jackson113 said:

Turn Cam into a running back

Turn CMC into a slot receiver 

Hurney done this to y’all. Go get a RB. A QB . A slot receiver. Fug  these wanna be players.

Cmc IS a slot receiver

Eddleman was a QB btw

you truly believe that if belicheck Peyton or mcvay had cmc he’d be getting 30 Carrie’s at RB? Lol

it’s just lazy and inept 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, jackson113 said:

If he was another race y’all wouldn’t have this conversation… since he’s a decent looking white dude… 

Gurley never was talked about the same way. He was a bum RB… what’s the difference…???

Judging someone based on the color of their skin is racism

 No matter how stupid you are.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

It's true.

 

He's the only player we have that's a threat to score on any play he touches the ball.

 

Less touches equals less implied points.

 

Thus out expected value goes down 

Less touches equals less net theoretical points only if he's on the field and producing for all of those touches.  If he gets hurt again, which is a greater danger with him having the kind of workload he has the last few times he's been available to play, and someone else entirely has to have those touches that whole theory falls on its face though.

Less, in this case, probably does equal more all told.  To me it doesn't matter if that "less" comes in the form of another back taking more touches, CMC spending more time as a receiver and less as a ball carrier, or some combination of the two.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Fatigue management is coaching 101 across all of sports and Rhule acts like it’s not a thing

Rhule is of course the guy who touted his sports science program as if it was something revolutionary, which we've heard nothing about since they figured out that every NFL team already did those things to the extent they're actually useful...

Edited by KSpan
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

To be fair, he could've played at least 2-3 more games last year and the year before. Rhule held him out both times, so fans could blame the player and not the coach.

Yes if we were truly in a playoff run Superbowl run he would have played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, I have only one pair of white shoes (only because they were new and like $4 from the Goodwill) other than my easily-cleaned Crocs. A man's got to think ahead.
    • Down to Carolina and Washington for Ehlers. 
    • Who are your top three breakout candidates for next season?    My three: Jatavion Sanders- Simply put he is the best receiving TE we have had since Olsen. We all saw his potential over that three game stretch prior to his neck injury where he showed a real connection with Bryce. Good route runner with glue for hands, limited blocking upside but he gives solid effort. With Tremble already being hurt I don’t see a reason why he already isn’t our starter and clear future at TE. Trevin Wallace- For a developmental LB forced into a starting role last year he  exceeded expectations. LB is one of the hardest positions to adjust to from college, and for a prospect who was widely regarded as very raw, surprisingly he was solid in coverage and only had an 11.9% missed tackle rate. He was overly aggressive consistently, and needs to work on his play recognition. But he is set up to be our best LB next season, and likely starter for years ahead. Even barring reaching his upside, his floor was clearly a lot higher than draft pundits assumed(Morgan can scout LBS). Cade Mayes- I am hopeful Cade wins the starting job at C this season. He may have been our most improved player last season, he looked like an above average starting C after he took over for an injured Corbett. He allowed 0 sacks on 327 pass block snaps. Corbett can not stay healthy, and at this stage in his career Mayes is objectively the better player. Mayes is only 26 and gives us the potential of stability at C, something we have never had since Ryan Kalil retired. Corbett slots in as a great backup C/Guard, and Cade continues to develop and gain more chemistry with Bryce and our stud duo of Hunt/Lewis.
×
×
  • Create New...