Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How will you feel if we PASS on a LT in round one…..


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

Beyond furious

There isn't a QB worth taking at 6 and there are 3 LT's worth taking there with at least one of them, if not multiple, likely to be there when we're on the clock.

Next to QB, having an elite LT can be the biggest difference maker a team can have.  I don't want a vet, I don't want Becton who can't stay healthy, give me a rookie who can be our starter at LT for the next 10-12 years.

The only other acceptable decision to me is to trade down to the 12-14 range to pick up additional picks and still come away with Penning, anything else and I'll be the most disappointed I've been with our first round pick in a long, long time.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on who they take. For example, if Thibodeaux or Walker are available at six, then I could understand us drafting one of them to pair with Burns. I could even understand if we decide to select Gardner or Stingley to upgrade our secondary. They are all value picks sixth overall. Ok, there are potential franchise left tackles that could be on the board then, but there are also pro ball caliber talents from other positions too. 

The only time I’d be annoyed is if they reach for someone or trade up for a quarterback in this year’s class. But even then, I could understand their desire to get their guy, even though I wouldn’t necessarily be happy or agree with giving up assets for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what it is we are getting in exchange. In your scenario we are still getting a good tackle but maybe we gets Thibs? I’d take that. 
 

But the truth is this franchise has ignored top end talent at LT for so many years in the draft I almost feel like the team owes it to the fans, and more importantly, it’s QBs. 
 

I find it hard to believe Cross and Neal will both be gone when we pick. Why not draft one of them and you can still sign a LT to help groom them because we obviously don’t do a great job of coaching up the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think the thought of sitting on their hands during day 2 will cause them to leave Neal or Cross on the board, trade back, and grab a lesser OL like Penning.  Then they might trade up for Howell---if the QBs fall, and I think they will---we could be looking at something like that.

It bothers me because both could bust.  We have never had good luck with small school OL here, and if Howell busts, there goes what could be a decade of LT bliss.

I could see it playing out like this.  I hope it's less of an option if Cross is still on the board.  But if Cross and Ikem are off and it's only Neal there maybe explore a trade down.   Trade with Philly.  15 and 19 for our 6 pick.  Then a combo of Penning and Howell.  Or a double down on oline.  Penning and Zion. That second option is only cause Zion is my guard crush of the year.  Him at LG or as a eventual center if Bozeman moves on would finally get some youth at oline.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

To fill another need on the team (QB, DE, etc) But sign this man to a 2 year contract…..honest opinions only. GO………

E36E326C-E62E-4F62-A9A3-133AA3EBBA7F.jpeg

1D119AC7-BCEC-4CA7-BE4E-3F3576334A91.jpeg

Draft a left tackle please. When you sign a tackle at 46, 37 years old you are more likely to get a broken down Russell Okung or Matt Khalil than you are a Whitworth. Then you are looking for a tackle again after kicking the can down the road in a year. Failure to draft the best available Left Tackle in this draft will be an absolute failure. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure how much he was a long term piece of this team.   Sucks to not have him as part of the rotation.   Looks like it's Lee Hunter time.     
    • This post was an error. Oops and sorry for the errors in the previous one. Too slow to edit.   We’ll see what they do.  
    • I am not sure he will put the over the games but we’ll probably have them.   Two things I am thinking.  We have 4 preseason games.  All the coaches have enough service time to know the standards that are in place for decades. If I recall it was play your starters just a series to start woth and build it up until week theee where play a lot and you have week four to set hour roster. Evaluate before cuts.   Bevell will certainly have the whole thing down pat.   I’d they don’t do the fries and frie air will worry too. Because it is set up to do that.     I have said since they went t three preseason people have to figure a new way are still feeling it out and trying things.  We don’t have to this year.  
×
×
  • Create New...