Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Browns miss the last FG, everybody here is singing a different tune....


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, musicman said:

I didn't say everything would be fine. I said the narrated would be different meaning "whew, we got a way with one there. At least they fought back to cover up how bad they played" or something along those lines. 

I'm confused.  They did show some flashes of knowing what to do but I again say it is mostly on the coaches.  Not all of it, but most of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just one observation, the Browns have always been a running team. They didn’t pass that much anyway and their WRs aren’t some top tier unit that was underutilized because of the downgrade, the “backup QB” effect was minimal. It’s not like we’re talking about the Chiefs minus Mahommes, the Browns with their backup QB is still 99% of the Browns. 
 

We looked like poo for half the game, looked pretty good for half the game. The run defense tightened up a bit (still not good enough though), but it was game one. Baker didn’t even get the full training camp as the #1 so he’s already behind the curve on a new team. Second half Baker was very good. The only thing I see on this team that isn’t likely to improve is the HC, and that’s just a cross we’ll have to bear for now. But the rest of the team was encouraging, even the OL. We won’t see another DL like that except once this year, against the Rams. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we didn't lose because of a field goal.

we lost because we were poorly prepared coming into the game, we took too long to make adjustments, and because of just overall poor game management. 

that's a recurring theme throughout rhule's tenure and by looking at this first game of the year, it's safe to assume there will be more of that. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

we didn't lose because of a field goal.

we lost because we were poorly prepared coming into the game, we took too long to make adjustments, and because of just overall poor game management. 

that's a recurring theme throughout rhule's tenure and by looking at this first game of the year, it's safe to assume there will be more of that. 

I listened to a lionshares worth of podcasts recapping week 1 yesterday and almost all of them to a man said the exact same thing.   It should never have gotten to a point where a call makes the difference playing jacoby brissette

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I listened to a lionshares worth of podcasts recapping week 1 yesterday and almost all of them to a man said the exact same thing.   It should never have gotten to a point where a call makes the difference playing jacoby brissette

can't make excuses for baker when you're playing against brissett.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an NFL team that hasn't had a winning season in five years. All the "what if" scenarios in the world aren't going to make this a winning franchise again. Only playing better football will and that begins with better coaching.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, rayzor said:

we didn't lose because of a field goal.

we lost because we were poorly prepared coming into the game, we took too long to make adjustments, and because of just overall poor game management. 

that's a recurring theme throughout rhule's tenure and by looking at this first game of the year, it's safe to assume there will be more of that. 

This 100%.

Hes Right GIF by MOODMAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of us would be glad for the win, because when your sports teams win; it feels good.  That's fine.

But I don't think there would be too much optimism.  The reality is we had a full team, Bozeman being the only real injury issue.  What a fortunate camp!  We had a defense that had weeks to prepare, to have schemes and plans to stop power running teams.  We have a new OC and system, but that OC is recognized for being at least decent.

While the "glass is always full of piss" crowd will never ever be happy with the Panthers, even if they win a Super Bowl, there wasn't a lot to celebrate other than the fighting back.  Fighting back means the team still gives a poo.  Rhule has earned a LOT of poo for being a terrible game coach, weak at Xs and Os, but his players play hard for him. That was still showing in the 4th quarter.

The problem is that regardless of the score we gave up TONS of rushing yards, bounced off running backs, missed tackles, and allowed a backup QB to play a turnover free game.  Our only sack came on a blitz, and pressure was always late.  He had it easy to hang back, find his spot and rip it.  Thankfully he missed some big throws.  Others, he did make some good throws that are hard to defend.  He's an NFL QB for a reason.

But we should have played better on offense.  Several 3 and outs in the first half gave Cleveland the ability to control the clock, even if they didn't light up the scoreboard.  Even if we'd have won by the skin of our teeth, games like this are untenable for the rest of the season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll say it

to run the ball and to stop the run, the o line and dline haveto be tough and nasty.  I do not see that   They have to have the ‘want to’  

The oline may come around with practice and Bozeman replacing Effline but that D line and LB corp are weak and too light 

Steve Smith on WFNZ  talked about Gross Mateo as an example  and the dline  yesterday  paraphrasing  ‘being a rotational piece being asked to be a full time player and he hasn’t transitioned to that role yet and the panthers like most of the nfl believe in the “next man Up theory but unfortunately, most times, the next man up are JAGs and the problem for the Panthers is they have a lot of JAGs on that line’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, musicman said:

I didn't say everything would be fine. I said the narrated would be different meaning "whew, we got a way with one there. At least they fought back to cover up how bad they played" or something along those lines. 

I totally agree, once the offense started moving the ball the defense played much better. But like you said, to play like shi1t as a team for a majority of the game, rebound to take the lead and then narrowly lose on the last play, takes grit. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, The Lobo said:

IF a frog had wings they wouldn’t bump their ass when they hop. 

This might be my new favorite.

 

but yeah, once we decided to run CMC up the gut and not even attempt going into the end zone, everyone and their mother knew how the game was going to end.  Their kicker lined up to kick and I just went to take a leak, didn’t even need to see it 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...