Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TOUGH QUESTION OF THE NIGHT: Name one area on the team that has improved under Rhule


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Panthercougar68 said:

On paper WR and corner. We really never had a group like this under Ron.

Corner I agree but WR is questionable. Sure the talent on paper is there but last  year Robby’s numbers were comical and we aren’t really lighting up the stat sheet at WR through the first two games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

defense played well, secondary is the best we’ve had in a while. ron didn’t believe in DBs. OL is the best we’ve had in a long time. people bitched for years that we didn’t address the LT. now we did, and people still bitch. don’t give me the crap about how he sucks. he’s played well for a rookie in one of the more difficult positions on the field. look at how well BC has developed. now extrapolate that to icky + BC, and the OL is solid.

Edited by Mother Grabber
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

I think the team is overall better. They just can’t seal the deal in crucial moments. It feels like a good team with a case of the yips. 

Fun fact the most horrendous, pathetic teams ever fielded in nfl histories with records from 0-3 wins actually averaged about eight games where the final score was one score or less.

8 games. That’s half the season. That’s average - sometimes it was more than that.

the 2008 0-16 Lions were literally the worst team in history and 6 games were one scores.

point being….close doesn’t mean dog poo in the nfl. all games are more or less close in the grand scheme of things. even the greatest coaches of all time don’t average an eye popping winning %.

who cares if Rhule ‘comes close’ it doesn’t mean poo and never will

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...