Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fit and Morgan: SHOULD they stay?


CanadianCat
 Share

Should Fitterer be tired to Rhue?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Fitterer be tired to Rhue?

    • Fire them all
      24
    • Fitterer gets a chance to hire his HC
      85


Recommended Posts

I'm all in on blowing up the coaching staff, but I actually really like what Fit and Morgan are doing. 

I think he has been hamstrung by the fact he was hired after Rhule and the final decision goes to Rhule but I love they way he approaches the draft and how he continues to look for value. 

I think he should be given the chance to hire his own staff and make the accountability start from there. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our roster is built pretty well, with a few exceptions (QB obviously, giving up draft capital, etc.) so I'd give them a shot to stick around with a new HC. However, if we want to go after a Sean Payton or Jim Harbaugh and they want full control and/or to handpick their own front office then by all means. I suspect either of them would be fine with Fitt/Morgan staying initially and if it wasn't working out after a year or two then they'd be replaced but for proven NFL coaches like those 2 I'd give them whatever they want.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing I wish Fitt would do is value early round picks better. A 3rd round for CJ Henderson, a future 3rd rounder (which will likely be a top 5-7 pick in the round) for Corral...these are premium picks that shouldn't be wasted on marginal talent. Other than that, I do like being aggressive and trading mid-to-late round picks for proven vets like Gilmore and Shenault.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with T96.   The roster is a pretty good unit with some young guys that could also become stars.  The glaring problem is obviously QB.   

 

Fitterer deserves his lumps because he was involved in Sam and Baker deals.     But I think he has built a roster that's worthy of having a shot with a real HC.      

 

I say let them both stay.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Fire Fitt and promote Morgan to GM.  Look at the Eagles or Lions OC as our next HC and I will be happy.  Harbaugh would be great, but I don't want any more of the full control bullshit so if that is a requirement then it's a hard pass for me.  

Fitterer is the reason Morgan is here.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Rhule having final say and without knowing really how much input they've had on personnel decisions it's pretty much impossible to say for sure. I lean pretty heavily toward no unless inside info says this is Rhule's clown show, they've tried to provide good guidance and he's ignored it to do clown show poo.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UNCrules2187 said:

The one thing I wish Fitt would do is value early round picks better. A 3rd round for CJ Henderson, a future 3rd rounder (which will likely be a top 5-7 pick in the round) for Corral...these are premium picks that shouldn't be wasted on marginal talent. Other than that, I do like being aggressive and trading mid-to-late round picks for proven vets like Gilmore and Shenault.

The trade for Henderson was excellent value. If we had drafted a starting CB in the 3rd round you'd call that a success right?

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

do we really wanna lose another rising star executive prodigy to another team, especially one with such fond homegrown roots

 

scott fitterer was with Seattle for a while and nobody but us sniffed around him

he was willing to be a subordinate to Matt rhule

he was the battery behind the Sam darnold trade

just clean house

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who was the real trigger man on the Darnold, Mayfield and Henderson trades?  Remember Rule has more pull on the roster decisions than Fitterer, which is crazy.  Even if Fitts didn't like the trades, could he have blocked them or all he could do was try to get the best value out of them when told to acquire these players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...