Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More trade predictions from LaCanfora


Paa Langfart
 Share

Recommended Posts

As a reminder , LaCanfora was saying that CMC was going to be traded before the deadline over a month ago.

 

The Carolina Panthers have been the center of attention heading into the NFL’s trade deadline, which looms on the first day of November. That will remain the case.

The rebuilding franchise already has completed two deals — including last week’s Christian McCaffrey blockbuster that we told you was coming about a month ago — and the expectation around the industry remains that the Panthers will continue amassing draft capital with at least two more transactions, most likely focused on the offensive and defensive line. While there is still a chance they move another star player — rival general managers continue to poke and prod and make attempts to pry more young talent out of Carolina — the executives I spoke with over the weekend believe the odds of Carolina dealing star pass rusher Brian Burns or versatile defensive back Jeremy Chinn are scant.

Contending teams, always looking to fortify their pass rush and offensive line, believe Carolina end Henry Anderson is a prime candidate to be dealt, with offense tackle Cameron Erving also seen as someone potentially on the move.

more

NFL trade deadline primer: Players and teams to watch - The Washington Post

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paa Langfart said:

As a reminder , LaCanfora was saying that CMC was going to be traded before the deadline over a month ago.


Contending teams, always looking to fortify their pass rush and offensive line, believe Carolina end Henry Anderson is a prime candidate to be dealt, with offense tackle Cameron Erving also seen as someone potentially on the move.

more

NFL trade deadline primer: Players and teams to watch - The Washington Post

do it

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Erving has been the type of mentoring presence for Ickey as that previous article made him out to be, I'd honestly rather keep him through the season than trade him for a conditional late round pick or something like that.

Same, although if we could get something for Erving in trade, that'd be kind of impressive.

As to Anderson, it's reasonable speculation. He just has to get over his "illness".

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may seem like little value but this is how you get those extra 5th-7ths that become part of draft day trades, or just a part of a bigger lot of draftees.  I mean, if we could legit move a vet on a 1-year deal for a draft pick, do it.  You re essentially securing draft capital for someone not on the roster or books next year. 

I'll give our expiring value that others could use now for future value.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Erving has been the type of mentoring presence for Ickey as that previous article made him out to be, I'd honestly rather keep him through the season than trade him for a conditional late round pick or something like that.

I'd rather have a 5th rounder and find a good o line coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...