Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers tried to trade for DJ Moore...

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

You need WRs, OL, PRs, and obviously a QB. I imagine it would take a lot to move a young talented player at any of these positions. LBs, RBs, TEs can be replaced by a serviceable player for pretty cheap. 

We have our OL set, a young talented WR and one that’s starting to flash in TMJ, a young talented PR in Burns, and an anchor in Brown. Chinn and Horn come in and give us talent at all levels of the defense (assuming we eventually get Chinn back at LB). There is no need to strip this roster down. Just add a young QB in the draft and develop him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Rags said:

Looking at how WR contracts are structered, idk why ppl want to get rid of D.J.

really good deal for the talent level.

Before the contract, I would have been ok with a trade.  Assuming the compensation was enough.

Now that we've traded CMC and Robby and DJ is extended, I really don't see the point.  We need somebody on offense for a QB to throw to.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
theinstrumental Community Regular

theinstrumental

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not sure if the tweet for a second was for Claypool only or all of them.  DJ is far more valuable than a 2nd and I am glad we didn't trade him for a 2nd.

Has to be just about Claypool, that’s Green Bay’s FO trying to make it look like they made the same offer Chicago made and it’s not their fault that they didn’t get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, theinstrumental said:

Has to be just about Claypool, that’s Green Bay’s FO trying to make it look like they made the same offer Chicago made and it’s not their fault that they didn’t get him.

The second round pick was for Claypool but the Steelers felt the Bears second round pick would be a higher pick than the Packers so they went with that. Plus, I love Justin Fields, but no offense.... Claypool would look significantly better with Rodgers throwing to him than Fields. If he plays up to his potential it looks like fair value for Chicago and Pitt. If he boomed under Rodgers the Steelers would look like they got robbed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • t96
      so yea... the um Saints.... how do we beat them this time?

      By t96 · Posted

      The Bucs have been struggling badly as of late so the Aints beating them doesn’t really say much about the Aints being any good. Even Shough (or however you spell it) wasn’t even good and the Bucs still beat themselves. We beat ourselves in the first matchup. If we can take down the Rams the Aints should be easy for us if we’re locked in and dialed in and guys don’t overlook them or assume it’ll be a gimme like last time. And need Bryce to not be absolutely awful like he was in the first matchup. But I do feel good about this game coming off the bye, I think we’ll finally get a convincing win with all 3 phases playing well (Atlanta blowout was good but the O really didn’t do much that game).    Hopefully we take care of business as we should and the Falcons can spoil the Bucs this Thursday so we can see what this team is made of at home in a couple weeks. I’m still very very far from sold on Canales/Morgan, despite the surprisingly solid year we’ve had so far. Bryce I am sold on not being the answer, but the more Canales can get out of him the more confidence I’ll have that he can help us develop a true franchise QB
    • cranky
      so yea... the um Saints.... how do we beat them this time?

      By cranky · Posted

      Horn can't fall again, they need to stop the run and they have to keep Shough contained in the pocket. Simple
    • TD alt
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Technically, he wasn't in the league when the Ravens called, but for discussion's sake Iet's assume that he was. The Ravens thing wasn't exactly a negative either. It's all about perspective, empathy and really having an open mind---and an independent mind, not necessarily given into trite, good-boy-bad-boy narratives of an institution that has had problems of varying degrees on its own as a whole. As for Sanders' abilities during college or three games into his pro career, sure I've seen better, but I've seen a lot worse. In my estimation, he deserves an honest chance just like any kid that's drafted into the league. He may not get it, due to the nature of the beast, but it's not because he's been stinking up the field.  
×
×
  • Create New...