Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it OVER for Wilks????


 Share

polls  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. Grade Wilks so far

    • A
      2
    • B
      54
    • C
      86
    • D
      21
    • F
      6
  2. 2. Do you want Wilks in 2023?

    • Yes
      31
    • No
      138


Recommended Posts

I'd give him a solid B, honestly. He is in an almost impossible situation.  Contrary to what some people say, our roster has LOTS of holes, including the most important on the field.  Darnold or PJ could be serviceable if we had dominance in other areas.

I'd like to see Wilkes be under consideration as a possibility for head coach but I'm certainly not sold that the job should be his.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hepcat said:

He has done better than Rhule but not good enough. The defense is littered with first round picks and the Steelers atrocious offense just abused them. That’s on him. He can go along with the rest of the entire staff and front office. 

Yeah pretty much. Steve really is just Ron 2.0.

Even if we stumble into the playoffs we need to be like the Titans and oust him. Imagine if the Titans missed out on Vrabel for Mike Mularkey. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

Today sealed it for me.  I was all aboard the wilks wagon until today.  The team was not prepared for a very bad Steelers team.  Good head coaches don’t lost to bad teams with the playoffs on the line at home.  Sorry Wilks, you ain’t it

Two bad teams faced each other. But one has a much better head coach.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yep so its essentially working against us
    • Solid point about the rookie contract especially since I believe Tepper and company brought that up, he was so good we could sign other players while he is on a rookie deal and capitalize on the cap space. Sorta like Seattle did with Russ while he was on a rookie deal. But, problem is Bryce isn’t close to that version of Russ and Tepper sucks as an owner. 
    • Look at who they’re interviewing there.  parcels, aikman, Peyton etc. the youngest guy is KOC who’s forty.  The passing game 25, 35, 45 years ago looked less glamorous to be sure but it was far more complex. You didn’t have these packages where you’d make quick checks, every play was its own thing, basically everyone was playing under center etc. once the nfl got out of the dead ball era things became very complex very quickly and they hadnt figured out a way to truncate it. Plus it was nowhere in college or high school. Vertical passing attacks just didn’t exist.  So yeah parcells probably does have that view because that’s what he came up in. Aikman had to learn that when he got to the nfl. Aikman was so lost his rookie season the cowboys almost took Jeff George first overall in 1990.  Today the learning curve is a lot lower. pro concepts today borrow a great deal from the college game now. Tons of air raid stuff, RPO, pistol, etc. even though everything is faster at every position, it’s schematically more simple. The learning curve is nowhere near what it was for even Peyton manning when he came out.  plus, prospects today are basically pro qbs from the time they’re in middle school. Bryce Young for example lived in invite only qb camps since he reached his max height at 12 years old. The whole “they shouldn’t get paid because they get a degree for free” was always just an insincere argument from racist old people, but no one even pretends to make it anymore. Playing qb at a division 1 school is a full time job for years before you even get to campus.  And that is all they do. The days of people excelling in multiple sports to the point there’s pro interest and then just choosing one or the other and succeeding are over. Aikman was drafted by the Mets out of high school and decided to go start as a freshman at Oklahoma.  The exact opposite is happening now, to the point you’ve got guys going to play baseball for a few years, coming back to college football, and playing until they’re like 27.  that’s actually one of the theories about why darnold isn’t better than everyone feels he should be. He only played two years of college football. In highschool he was first team all everything in every sport. Dude has an insane athletic pedigree. But there’s at least four years of highschool invite camps he never got to go to. You can’t just be the most athletic guy in the room anymore.  So obviously the older guys are complaining about how things are done; it’s what offer guys do. But the pro game today is much more accessible for these guys than it was back in their day, and the players are more ready for the transition. Like is anyone defending Anthony Richardson? What im saying is we know what Bryce young is and we should t wait for waiting’s sake. 
×
×
  • Create New...