Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it OVER for Wilks????


 Share

polls  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. Grade Wilks so far

    • A
      2
    • B
      54
    • C
      86
    • D
      21
    • F
      6
  2. 2. Do you want Wilks in 2023?

    • Yes
      31
    • No
      138


Recommended Posts

I'd give him a solid B, honestly. He is in an almost impossible situation.  Contrary to what some people say, our roster has LOTS of holes, including the most important on the field.  Darnold or PJ could be serviceable if we had dominance in other areas.

I'd like to see Wilkes be under consideration as a possibility for head coach but I'm certainly not sold that the job should be his.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hepcat said:

He has done better than Rhule but not good enough. The defense is littered with first round picks and the Steelers atrocious offense just abused them. That’s on him. He can go along with the rest of the entire staff and front office. 

Yeah pretty much. Steve really is just Ron 2.0.

Even if we stumble into the playoffs we need to be like the Titans and oust him. Imagine if the Titans missed out on Vrabel for Mike Mularkey. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

Today sealed it for me.  I was all aboard the wilks wagon until today.  The team was not prepared for a very bad Steelers team.  Good head coaches don’t lost to bad teams with the playoffs on the line at home.  Sorry Wilks, you ain’t it

Two bad teams faced each other. But one has a much better head coach.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...