Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading for Sean Payton vs Settling for Steve Wilks


Trading for Sean Payton vs Settling for Steve Wilks  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Trading for Sean Payton
      64
    • Settling for Steve Wilks
      27


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Yall can keep Taysom Hill.

The only reason I mentioned Taysom is because, SP told M Loomis, “He wanted to take Taysom Hill with him.”

not sure why we would not want him.  Just because he played for the hated arch rival, doesn’t make him a bad player.  I am not saying we would want Taysom Hill.  I am saying he would be an excellent play if he works with SP.  I am not sure I would kick him off the football field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I feel like "settling" is an appropriate word for how I would feel if we hire Steve Wilks. He's fine, but he ain't winning any championships.

it just feels like the 10-7, 6-11, 9-8, 4-13 road ahead would be set in stone for us

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 I am not a fan of giving division rivals extremely high draft picks for a their former coach. George Siefert comes to mind and we didn't have to give up high draft picks for him.  Personally, if feels like a Sean Payton money grab for him.  That's why I think he'll go to Denver .  Walton has deep pockets as well. Denver  Division  is tougher than our NFC South currently. But I don't think he cares. It's about a big pay day.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TMac is a good player and would've been the right pick if our QB could throw a ball farther than 40 yards. For this team's current build (run first, game management passing attack) and the fact that our TE's are laughably bad - the five on our roster have combined for less than 600 yards total, with 3 TDs - Warren should've been the pick. 
    • If anyone feels like they can't have a conversation about Bryce Young nearly three full seasons into his career maybe assess why and how these conversations end this way instead of looking to shoot the messenger. Why is it okay to label anyone else on the team or coaching staff trash? Folks on the huddle and across the fanbase on social media have fully thrown anyone and everyone including rookie 8th overall pick TMac fully under the bus multiple times this season. But some of you guys apparently expect a pat on the back because Bryce Young successfully evaded a few potential sacks while Tyler Shough got consumed by our pass rush throughout the game and still had a superior performance. The state of this division is hilariously mediocre at best. Bryce Young is the only player on this roster who is allowed to have the lowest bar possible yet we have invested the most resources in him. It's lunacy.
    • Bussi in net against the team that waived him
×
×
  • Create New...