Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson “knocked” S2 cognitive test “out of the park”.


DFive
 Share

Recommended Posts

According to the article, Bryce Young scored the highest at 93. Interestingly enough, it also mentions Will Levis as scoring high as well. No mention of CJ Stroud or his score or if he even took it. For reference, Brock Purdy scored in the mid 90’s last year. 
 

 

Edited by DFive
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allegedly all 4 of the top QBs this year did very well on the test, with Young being a bit ahead of the other 3.

I'm not hanging to much on this test quite yet tho, it sounds better than the wonderlic but notice how only the hits are being leaked. I'm willing to bet that there are a few that scored high but haven't done well in the NFL and some that did poorly or average and are doing decently. Gotta see all the test takers and their current status in the league.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S2 test may seem laughable but I don’t think it’s something you can practice or get better at. Either your brain can process visual information quickly or it can’t. 
 

it’s encouraging for AR15 and his future development. He reminds me of Josh Allen, he was also raw but was in a good situation to develop. 
 

Does anyone know what CJ’s score is? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Haener was the other QB in the 90s. 

Unrelated but I do feel strongly that he’ll be an asset for a team. Perfect backup that has starter potential down the road.

He secured himself a R3-4 selection at his pro day and possibly the next QB taken after Hooker.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I just don't want us to spend our pick chasing Cam Newton 2.0. There's only one Cam and we aren't resurrecting him with this pick.

Agreed but we also shouldn’t ignore any prospect that has a similar playing style as Cam. Just grade them all on an equal playing field and if the one who reminds fans of Cam makes the most sense then draft him. I’m not saying this is the case this year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I believe Haener was the other QB in the 90s. 

Unrelated but I do feel strongly that he’ll be an asset for a team. Perfect backup that has starter potential down the road.

He secured himself a R3-4 selection at his pro day and possibly the next QB taken after Hooker.

Haener has been your guy for a while. I could see him finding some success in the league.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...