Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mocking Day 2 picks 32-39 with no trades


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

32. Pittsburgh:  Joey Porter, CB  Penn State:  Fills a need and makes too much sense.
33. Arizona:  Keion White, DE, Georgia Tech:  White fills the biggest need at any position in the NFL with a 4-3 DE pass rusher
34. Detroit: Michael Mayer, TE Notre Dame:  TE is a need, and Mayer is too good to pass up.
35. Indianapolis:  Brian Branch, CB/S Alabama:  Colts have need at both CB and S--Branch is both.  Could go OG here.
36. Los Angeles Rams:  Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee: Stafford needs a WR and they are not deep in this draft  Mingo a possibility here as well.
37. Seattle: BJ Ojulari, OLB/Edge, LSU:  Seattle switched to a 3-4 base last year, and need an edge.  
38. Las Vegas: Will Levis, QB, Kentucky: They could go CB or G here, but Levis is a tremendous value and a long term need.  Raiders love players with a chip on their shoulders.
39. Carolina:  Trade back.  You have the top 2 Guards on the board (Torrence and Aliva), OLB/Edges Hall and Sanders, TE Washington, CBs Brents, Ringo, and Turner, and an OT I really like, Bergeron from Syracuse.  UNC WR Downs is sitting right there--waiting to drive down 85 to play for the Black and Blue.   That is 10 players, so I would move back to 48-50 if I could, then move up to about 60 to get a second day-2 player.  But that is just me--I live on the edge.

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GOAT said:

have a feeling the Rams are going to shock everyone and take Levis to sit behind Stafford until he's ready.

Rams know Cohen his OC in 21 well, and it sounds like they are concerned about his long term health, it makes a lot of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trading back might just make the most sense. there's going to be a whole lot of solid talent available the rest of the day and anyone we get at 39 won't be much better than who we are capable of getting later on. just not enough separation between the talent. there's just a lot of good players out there to be had, imo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

32. Pittsburgh:  Joey Porter, CB  Penn State:  Fills a need and makes too much sense.
33. Arizona:  Keion White, DE, Georgia Tech:  White fills the biggest need at any position in the NFL with a 4-3 DE pass rusher
34. Detroit: Michael Mayer, TE Notre Dame:  TE is a need, and Mayer is too good to pass up.
35. Indianapolis:  Brian Branch, CB/S Alabama:  Colts have need at both CB and S--Branch is both.  Could go OG here.
36. Los Angeles Rams:  Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee: Stafford needs a WR and they are not deep in this draft  Mingo a possibility here as well.
37. Seattle: BJ Ojulari, OLB/Edge, LSU:  Seattle switched to a 3-4 base last year, and need an edge.  
38. Las Vegas: Will Levis, QB, Kentucky: They could go CB or G here, but Levis is a tremendous value and a long term need.  Raiders love players with a chip on their shoulders.
39. Carolina:  Trade back.  You have the top 2 Guards on the board (Torrence and Aliva), OLB/Edges Hall and Sanders, TE Washington, CBs Brents, Ringo, and Turner, and an OT I really like, Bergeron from Syracuse.  UNC WR Downs is sitting right there--waiting to drive down 85 to play for the Black and Blue.   That is 10 players, so I would move back to 48-50 if I could, then move up to about 60 to get a second day-2 player.  But that is just me--I live on the edge.

 

Might work if you do multiple trades. One problem is the Bucs and Saints probably have the best pick positions to swap with but the reality of that happening is slim. Seahawks you could get maybe 52 and 83 for 39

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

trading back might just make the most sense. there's going to be a whole lot of solid talent available the rest of the day and anyone we get at 39 won't be much better than who we are capable of getting later on. just not enough separation between the talent. there's just a lot of good players out there to be had, imo.

After all the trade backs in 2021 we got a ton of nickels that honestly didn’t make our team any better. I’d rather just draft the guy at 39 who we think is the best player rather than get two guys later in the 2nd/3rd that are both less talented than the guy at 39. You have more chances to hit but more of a chance of getting a bunch of easily replaceable guys who don’t help you win. At some point we need more above average starters so we have a more talented team. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope when the pick rolls around to 39 the war room is jumping up and down because somebody, and I don’t care who or what position, is still on the board that they REALLY want. If they aren’t enthused by anyone, or is it “convicted”, then they entertain a trade back. Problem is who do they partner with in that case. Otherwise whoever they like best out of Torrence, Hall or Brents. Or I guess they could Minnesota it and just wait to turn the pick in.

Edited by mccjeff
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I felt pretty good about us making progress this season, surprising some people, and getting some more wins than last season going into it.  Now, after preseason, my expectations are much, much lower. I was talking with my friend who is a Bears fan, and we were discussing their drubbing of the Bills and how people try to dismiss it as “preseason, so it doesn’t count.”  It absolutely counts.  Not the wins or losses.  No one really cares about that.  But what the Bears are doing shows that even in a vanilla, non-specific scheme, they are executing at an elite level and they are disciplined.  It shows they are well coached.  They see growth in their players.  Versus us - hard to tell what we’re looking at because everything is a fuging mess.  In games we’re still undisciplined, be it penalties or assignments.  We do NOT execute.  We got random coaches calling plays that won’t be calling plays during the season, we have our players getting into fights in the last padded practice of the preseason, then we have Bryce and Chuba trying to correct it while our coach sat off to the side laughing.  To be clear, I like Canales.  He seems like a good dude.  But, it feels like we have very little direction and discipline.  You’re allowing a team who has been historically bad the last almost decade, with a losing culture that mostly bereft of talent to self-police?  You’re allowing subordinates to work in pet projects at the expense of getting valuable reps and evaluation of players in during games?     My friend literally brought up last night that when Ben Johnson got there he essentially put DJ Moore in notice because it was starting to be perceived that he was displaying some diva-behavior.  That’s leadership.  And they’re reaping the benefits early and setting a tone.  My friend said there is an excitement and confidence in and around their team that’s he’s never felt his entire life.  And here we are, sounding and looking like The Bad News Bears in our final week of training camp and preseason.  I literally stopped watching after halftime last week.  I used to watch every play faithfully, even in 2001 and 2010.  It was fun.  This isn’t.  We are bad and our administration keeps making bad decisions to compound things.  Reading poo like this today is just fuging deflating.
    • With so much of the focus the past couple years being on offense, the defense has definitely taken a backseat to the talent available in the draft. I get it, they want to surround their number one draft pick QB with offensive playmakers but unfortunately that has come with a price that so far has not worked Let’s hope the offense and Bryce Young put it together this year or it’s going to be another rebuild next year with another new QB. 
    • I was intrigued by him but always said it comes down to the interview process and talking to his former coaches, etc. You gotta find out if he's coachable and has the mental makeup. I think we've found the answer. LOL
×
×
  • Create New...