Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The CAP is now $255.4 MILLION….. now pay Burns, Brown, Luvu and let’s get this ship righted

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

If the panthers signed a FA one trick pony edge rusher who admitted to dogging all of last season quitting on his team, can’t play the run for s*** and whose potential has yet to materialize in 4 years for 25 million a year… the huddle would completely melt down and other teams would clown us. 

That would actually be a win of sorts. We offered 5 years and $27 mil, supposedly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Burns is not a dawg. Hill I am willing to die on. Now let's see if Morgan was for real about how he wanted to build this team.

I said before that this is pretty much the Dan Morgan is legit test.

What he does with burns says a lot about what to expect going forward.

I'm just hoping that the teppers didn't make burns untouchable.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I said before that this is pretty much the Dan Morgan is legit test.

What he does with burns says a lot about what to expect going forward.

I'm just hoping that the teppers didn't make burns untouchable.

It probably won't matter in a couple of years except to a few hard core fanatics here.  If he gets traded or cut and plays well for another team, the hard core will claim its another DJ Moore, CMC situation and blame Morgan.  If we sign him for 30 a year, a different group of hard core fans will complain about that.

In the end though, Morgan will likely be judged on wins and what he does at QB if Young doesn't work out.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMaulClaw Mentor

TheMaulClaw

Posted
Posted

I just don't care if Burns is on the team or not.  In fact I associate him with losing.  I say take that money and let us build our offense up.  Let's become monsters on the offensive line and bring in some weapons.  I think it's easier to fix a defense then an offense now.  In fact the best defense is a good offense.  If we can control the ball and chew clock by sustaining drives it would be the best thing we could do for our defense with or without Burns.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cmichd08 Rising Star

cmichd08

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I agree with all except want to pump the brakes on Burns. Am I correct that he wants 30 million and turned down 27 million? If so is he truly worth that much? If we were talking the top guy in the league or next to top guy in the league I understand but is Burns truly worth what he is wanting?

30 million no he isn't since he didn't play at full speed last year. Give him a 2 or 3 year with an option to talk after year two. Brown is coming up next year is he not. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pww42 Contributor

pww42

Posted
Posted

Straight up let them go.. unless we can get them to sign on a good price.. Allowing us to  add to our team additional players who will help turn things around.
They are not what  a “franchise” player is. I always have assumed a franchise player is a guy who can by them-self make play after play that effects the game..

Luvu is close , Brown is as well, but Burns, He is not the guy that can just take the game into his hands and effect the out come of a game. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...