Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Olsen nominated for Emmy over Tom Brady


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MechaZain said:

Imagine paying $375 million to replace a guy up for his third Emmy in a row

Fox Media has really been killing it, right?  Lots of great and smart choices like that to inspire confidence from the shareholders!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I'm glad its not just Panther fans that see it.  

The only people that don't like Olsen in that job are the people who hated watching their team play him. Years of ex-players that make mute a better option during games make him a stud in comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

and that guy has a conflict of interest that affects his assignment

We were given a  Buccaneers player as our commentator for years so I don't think they care about that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, La Pantera said:

Brady has minority ownership in the Raiders.

Yea he can't go to pre-game practice or talk with other players. Getting paid all that money but can't do the full job.

Fox should get that money back since he can't even do his job correctly since he is part of ownership. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NCBlu said:

Yea he can't go to pre-game practice or talk with other players. Getting paid all that money but can't do the full job.

Fox should get that money back since he can't even do his job correctly since he is part of ownership. 

What I heard fox paid him, I thought it was insane. Then it was explained to me by someone in the business, fox is buying the rights for Tom Bradys time. Theres more than calling a 3.5 hour game with his responsibilities. He's very known and people would pay to meet him, hear him speak, or just be in the same room. It's similar to politicians getting paid to eat or speak at events. Being around a celebrity is a huge deal for many football fans. He's the goat like it or not, fox has many sponsors and having Brady under contract control allows for more favors and most important more money making opportunities.   

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correctly so...

Olsen is the best analyst in the game right now. Fox screwed up betting on Brady to be a better option.

I've kinda wondered if Sunday Night Football might make a play for him somewhere down the road.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Basbear said:

What I heard fox paid him, I thought it was insane. Then it was explained to me by someone in the business, fox is buying the rights for Tom Bradys time. Theres more than calling a 3.5 hour game with his responsibilities. He's very known and people would pay to meet him, hear him speak, or just be in the same room. It's similar to politicians getting paid to eat or speak at events. Being around a celebrity is a huge deal for many football fans. He's the goat like it or not, fox has many sponsors and having Brady under contract control allows for more favors and most important more money making opportunities.   

Right but a majority of those other responsibilities outside that 3.5 hours he literally can't do. Hell even stuff during the game like commenting on calls he disagrees with from the officials he isn't supposed to do. His name doesn't add any value to Fox imo. No one is tuning in to a game they otherwise wouldn't watch for any announcer regardless of name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
    • I hate Marchand, but if he became a free agent.....
×
×
  • Create New...