Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All six of Nic Scourten’s pass rush attempts yesterday


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Dave Canales was asked why the young guys don't play on defense but do on offense.  He basically said he would like to see the young guys play more, but will leave that up to evero.  Doesn't sound like a head coach

Exactly.

We hired an offensive minded head coach. Not an offense only head coach. If he is too timid to dictate what he wants to his entire staff coming off a season where his defense gave up historic points then he's already got one foot out the door.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nic. I don't even notice him while watching. Those 6 plays look....he's got the effort!!!

Prince.....Mr I move like sex, brother MOVE faster!!!! Especially the first moves, he's acting like the play is not over within 3 seconds. There's no "setting" up the OT, you will be off the field the next play, exploded my friend.

 

Still these are rookies and you should never judge them until next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Dave Canales was asked why the young guys don't play on defense but do on offense.  He basically said he would like to see the young guys play more, but will leave that up to evero.  Doesn't sound like a head coach

This is really bad, disappointing to hear. Evero is terrible, and he’s being enabled by DC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Booty cheeks. Doesn't look like he has any pass rush plan or any technical moves to defeat blocks. He pretty much just tries to bull rush the blocker then immediately quits if that doesn't work.

So let me guess, after one game we’re ready to move on from Nic. Imagine moving on from Derrick Brown because he wasn’t impressing.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Dave Canales was asked why the young guys don't play on defense but do on offense.  He basically said he would like to see the young guys play more, but will leave that up to evero.  Doesn't sound like a head coach

Embarrassing and concerning answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the Panthers. Evero was a holdover from the last staff that was assembled by Tepper and I'm sure it was Tepper who told Canales he was staying onboard. Canales probably feels like the guy doesn't even report to him.

 Could be part of the reason other coaching candidates wanted nothing to do with us.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the Panthers. Evero was a holdover from the last staff that was assembled by Tepper and I'm sure it was Tepper who told Canales he was staying onboard. Canales probably feels like the guy doesn't even report to him.

He probably doesn’t. Remember this is the same team that had coaches stabbing each other in the back less than two years ago. I can’t imagine any of the other 31 franchises being remotely this toxic and dysfunctional and that’s before we even bring up records and stats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

I can’t imagine any of the other 31 franchises being remotely this toxic and dysfunctional and that’s before we even bring up records and stats. 

The Colts might end up there. You have the late Jim Irsay's totally not insane widow running the show from the sidelines wearing a headset with a play sheet literally questioning in game decisions in real time

usatsi_19747784.thumb.jpg.d77182f9fcd016f01e9834f73110f501.jpg

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...