Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyler Murray to CAR?


CAPantherFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

AI Overview
 
 
 
Negative perceptions of NFL quarterback Kyler Murray focus on his perceived 
lack of accountability, leadership, and consistency, as well as concerns about his physical durability and struggles with downfield passing. Critics point to his lucrative contract and the team's struggles, arguing that he needs to be more accountable, while some also criticize his decision-making and inability to consistently elevate the team. 
 
Player performance and consistency
  • Downfield passing: Some analysts argue Murray struggles to consistently push the ball downfield and that his throws can be inaccurate or floaty.
  • Mediocrity: Certain critiques suggest his play is mediocre, with a failure to turn games around, even with good protection and receivers.
  • Inconsistency: He is often criticized for a lack of consistency and the inability to stay healthy over a full season. 
Leadership and attitude
  • Lack of accountability: Media members have called for him to take more responsibility for the team's performance.
  • Perceived immaturity: Some have questioned his leadership, with a belief that he is self-centered and immature, though others disagree.
  • "Duck, duck, goose" play: One specific criticism is that he holds the ball too long and scrambles unnecessarily, delaying plays and confusing receivers. 
Contract and injury concerns
  • Lucrative contract: His large contract is often cited by critics, who argue that his performance does not justify the investment.
  • Injury proneness: There are concerns about his durability due to his style of play and previous injuries, which impacts his long-term reliability. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?  Seriously.  Why?

He plays high school BS run around behind the line and hope something comes open offense.  No structure, no discipline, no timing nothing.

Hes just a mirror image of Bryce.  Has physical tools to succeed but no football IQ at all.

Same results, different kind of disappointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SOJA said:

If we are going to take a swing on an overpriced QB that hasn't worked out I'd much rather go with Trevor Lawrence. 

 

Kyler feels like a Jet tbh

Kyler is a realistic option for the Cardinals to trade without nuking their salary cap.

Attempting to trading Lawrence is an instant H-Bomb to Jacksonville's cap and will cause an unbelievable mess for them. 

Now, that said, what Kyler being traded to us would immediately accomplish is fuging up our cap without a really big overhaul of his contract. So, in the case that we decided to make this move, it's not likely a prove it deal, it's a long term marriage.

That ain't smart.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...