Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Norv Turner primarily to blame for all of our end of game fails on offense?


Mage

Recommended Posts

I'm of the belief that, all things considered, Turner has generally done a good job here.  Our offense was super effective prior to Newton's injury and, even with a clearly limited QB in Allen, we've had games where we are able to put up points.

However, Turner's red-zone and short-yardage play-calling is dreadful and it's killed us late in games.  And I would argue such play-calling and approach has been responsible for several losses in the last 2 seasons.

vs Redskins (2018): With 47 seconds left at the Redskins 16 yard line, Newton inexplicably attempts consecutive deep passes to Funchess and McCaffrey on 2nd and 5 and 3rd and 5 despite having 2 timeouts left.

vs Lions (2018): Panthers fail on the 2 point conversion, opting to pass the ball instead of running it in with Cam.

vs Seahawks (2018): This wasn't a red-zone situation, but we had the ball left with 2 minutes left in the game.  We play it conservatively and fail to use all of the Seahawks timeouts anyway, forcing us to kick a 52 yard field goal (which Gano missed) and gives the Seahawks an easy game winning drive

vs Browns (2018): Panthers have 4 plays within the Browns 10 yard line and can't score.  They picked up 6 yards on the first down with McCaffrey, then proceeded to run the ball with Moore and pass the ball the next 2 plays.

vs Saints (2018): Once again, the Panthers have the ball late in the game (1:44 left) with an opportunity to tie or win it outright.  We fail to make it past our 39 yard line... but to be fair by this point Newton's shoulder was dead.  

vs Bucs (2019): Fake Philly...

vs Packers (2019): With 32 seconds left, Panthers have a 1st down at the Packers 13 yard line.  Panthers fail to score despite 4 plays within their 4 yard line

vs Saints (2019): Panthers have 5 plays within the Saints 8 yard line and 8 plays total in the redzone.  Come away with 0 points.

I know it all can't be blamed on Turner, but this is ridiculous.  Extremely winnable situations, other than the Saints 2018 game, and we come away with 0 points in every scenario.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norv is limited in that we need 1 more top WR, 3 offensive linemen, and one could argue that the QB play has been erratic, but I reserve judgement on that until the WR is signed and the OL fixed.

So what can you call?  quick passes and run plays such as power and counter so that we get an extra OL on the play side. 

I think he is a bit out of date, but he is who he is, and we could do much worse.  Note that despite the problems, the biggest issues are on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are taking off the homer shades, Turner has been worse than even Mike Shula in some areas.

The Panthers situational playcalling has more often than not been either inconsistent or downright laughably predictable at times. Bright spots are few and far between. Yes there have been issues with the offensive line, but this staff needs an influx of innovation badly. That's just not going to happen with a head coach who is afraid to bring in anyone but his close pals or simply promoting from within.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see what Peyton has done with Brees, the hand injury and beat up Oline. Short plays and get rid of the ball very quickly. Allen is no Brees, but that's the choice you have when Oline can't hold a block for 3 seconds.

Norv knows this I'm sure.... or I hope he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sincerely believe the decimation of our OL and Cam’s absence are the reason we’ve had red zone issues.

 

The thing is teams had to account for Cam as a running threat. So if we we’re in 10 personnel they have to have 7 in the box to account for the OL (5), CMac, and Cam. Now that defensive coordinators don’t have to worry about a threat of a running QB then they have more people on the perimeter to mitigate our passing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB, OL, are the main concerns at this point, if memory serves while 6-2 our red zone offense was fine, and we were scoring  / winning those games with NOWHERE near the level of pass rush that we can generate this year. 

We still have yet to see the offense in general operate at capacity due to injuries. Keep in mind our starting LT was Chris Clark, off a COUCH most of last year. 

I would argue that we are too small across the entire WR group - 5'11 (Moore), 5'10 (Samuel), 5'11 (Wright) - We did add some size in Moncrief (6'2). So to me a lot of the RZ issues are personnel related, I'd also personally like to see a 230 ish HB for the GL as well. Love CMC, just would like to see a bigger back for the GL.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The usual problem teams face inside the five is their offenses are not geared toward it.  High-powered, pass-oriented offenses that run deeper patterns have trouble adjusting.  Some even benefit from false starts and such that back them up five yards farther.

That is NOT our problem.  Our OL would have trouble controlling and pushing a decent college team.  And, we do not employ a bruiser in the backfield in those situations, which means we rely largely on finesse or CMCs ability to get through small openings.  That is the only similarity between us and the offenses I mentioned above.

That is not on Turner.  What is on Turner is that he has always been one of those offensive coaches that believesTDs count for more points when they are pretty rather than punch-in-the-mouth type plays.  I lived in the DC area when he was the HC there and was calling the plays, and while I was not a Redskin fan, it was predictable that he would forego or abandon an effective, grinding offense in favor of opening it up, even when the defense had not given any indication they could stop the grinding.  That was not situational dependent, either.  Third and a yard.....fire away and bring on the punter.

So, it is a combination of the Panthers not having the OL and not utilizing a fire plug running back in those situations (even as a decoy), and the fact that even if they could, Turner might not be inclined to use them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. He’s been light years ahead of Shula, but some of the goal line play calling has been just as bad. Red, I gotta strongly disagree with you about the situational play calling. That’s been the area where he’s been the most upgrade over Shula. My only real complaint has been the goal line stuff. Otherwise, the offense has been mostly just plagued by bad OL and injured/mediocre QB play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...