Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

25% of the way thru the season. What has changed for you?


Icege

Recommended Posts

and what hasn't?

I went into the season hopeful, but bracing myself for growing pains. Perhaps the biggest thing that is changing for me is Yetur Gross-Matos. He looked markedly improved in this game compared to limited snaps prior. We didn't have much of a sample size with him dealing with an injury, but if he keeps it up we can see this defense looking really good for a really long time. I was not impressed at the start, but the young man has plenty of season left.

What hasn't changed for me are questions surrounding our TEs, but Brady's system doesn't seem to utilize them much outside of catching over the middle of the field and running routes to set up downfield blocks for receivers. I've also been a staunch KK defender, but they need him to do a little more than eat up double teams to allow the younger guys 1v1s. We need him to eat when Brown gets him those looks for himself.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the best we could do was 2-6 first half of the season ,4-4 second half .

That we had a lot of talented rookies on defense that would be hurt by mistakes .

Now i think we have a chance of making the play-offs and maybe winning the division,

but teams will have film on us now so we still need to improve to get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected to go into every game this season knowing we would not be favored to win. With everything to overcome such as  the amount of young players, turnover, and new coaching staff without an offseason along with adjusting to the NFL. So far we have been competitive every single game and seem to be improving each week. This could be a team that no one wants to play at the end of the year if we continue to improve. Our future looks bright over the next 1-2 seasons if we continue drafting well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew that our short term success would depend upon defense. I never believed that we would be as bad defensively as the Huddle faithful were crowing, but after the first game I was becoming as skeptical as anyone. Now that we've shown growth, I think we'll end up middle of the pack to good, as opposed to middle of the pack to bad: the difference between 6-10 to 9-7

Of course if we keep improving, 10-6 is not out of the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...