Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Want to feel sick?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

I highly doubt he makes it to 8. I’d take him over Wilson tho in a heart beat. 

Yeah  i doubt it too, but i can def see it more now than i could two months ago . It’s trending upwards everyday and with No combine it could get even worse . I’m holding out hope . Yeah fields toughness alone is made for the nfl . And I’m scared of Lance n Wilson just haven’t seen enough to have a valid opinion  and they play nobodies . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to draft higher too, but Washington was so bad that day we would have had to overtly and intentionally thrown the game. What do you people want?  "Hey Mike, 4 fumbles today."  "Defense, we're not trying today. No open field tackles."

Move on. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrizzMachete said:

Yeah  i doubt it too, but i can def see it more now than i could two months ago . It’s trending upwards everyday and with No combine it could get even worse . I’m holding out hope . Yeah fields toughness alone is made for the nfl . And I’m scared of Lance n Wilson just haven’t seen enough to have a valid opinion  and they play nobodies . 

I think Lance needs to sit for a year, but to me he has probably the highest ceiling of what he could be. They do run a pro offense at his school tho which helps. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree, it's really pointless to get annoyed by this right now. It is what it is. We all know this team loves meaningless wins. They did it every time with Rivera, Ironically they did it TO Rivera this time around. 

They got a decision to make now, roll with Asswater one more year, or trade for a QB or Draft one. That simple. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

I'd like to draft higher too, but Washington was so bad that day we would have had to overtly and intentionally thrown the game. What do you people want?  "Hey Mike, 4 fumbles today."  "Defense, we're not trying today. No open field tackles."

Move on. 

 

That might not have been enough to lose that game.  Refusing to make open field tackles would have probably resulted in their receivers/ball carriers running to the end zone.....the wrong way.

The Foreskins would have lost to the '76 Bucs that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

That might not have been enough to lose that game.  Refusing to make open field tackles would have probably resulted in their receivers/ball carriers running to the end zone.....the wrong way.

The Foreskins would have lost to the '76 Bucs that day.

That game brought back a lot of bad memories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have been really hard to lose that game the way WFT played. It was signing Teddy that really screwed us this year, he won just enough.

It was the perfect year to have a down year( we still did anyway) but we had to "try to compete". I thought we were rebuilding...more like doing demo. Oh well 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...