Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler: The sense around the league is the Panthers will be competitive in trade talks surrounding Matt Stafford


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Stafford ain't coming to Carolina unless the front office can somehow convince him we are further along in this rebuild that everyone else can plainly see.  Stafford has said he's not interested in being part of a rebuild.  We are just in year two, so yes, we are STILL rebuilding.

Ya I don't see any of the vets ending up here. Everyone is going to be trying to pull a Brees(Old school) Brady(This year) now. Nor should we want them. Really should just stick it out another year with Teddy and accumulate/use all the picks to round out the team. We aren't competing for playoffs next year baring a miracle anywho. 8-8ish here we come.

Edited by Harbingers
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TriggaPlease89 said:

I was going to use Nick Foles but he fetched a 4th and he was a SB winning QB. So enlighten me, without bias speculation, what a good starting point should be. Last time I checked starting QBs are not traded often. 

 

Technically he was the backup, but because Wentz got hurt Foles got the start the remainder of the season.  Kind of a catch 22 there, but generally starters worth their salt start with at a least one first round price tag and only get more expensive the better they are.  Remember, Philly chose to keep Wentz over Foles and Nick needed to be dealt,so they weren't going to get overly rich in their demands. While his trade price wasn't crazy, look at what he demanded once he got to the Jags and look where the Jags are now.  Foles massive failure is giving the Jags Trevor Lawrence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to have Stafford. But not if it means giving up #8 plus more. He has a lot of wear and tear on him after 12 seasons of starting in the NFL. Maybe he has another 4-5+ years of high level play left. Or maybe he's already on the decline. I don't want to part with #8 for a guy who will be 33 in a couple of weeks. I definitely don't want to part with #8 and more. Two #2s would probably be my ceiling.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A team like the Colts or Niners should give their first for him and the Lions should take it. It gets Stafford to a team ready to win now and they get a mid first round pick for him which sounds right. Maybe throw in a 3rd... Colts 1st and 3rd for Stafford and Lions 5th sounds pretty fair to me.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d love to have Stafford, he’s a great QB who has been hampered by a bad organization.  The injury thing is overblown.  In his last 10 years, only in one season (2019) did he not play the full 16 games.  However, I wouldn’t want to trade multiple picks for the guy.  As much as I’d love either Watson or Stafford, I want to just draft a QB at 8 and roll with it since I feel like the compensation otherwise is just too much.  Trey Lance at #8 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Stafford ain't coming to Carolina unless the front office can somehow convince him we are further along in this rebuild that everyone else can plainly see.  Stafford has said he's not interested in being part of a rebuild.  We are just in year two, so yes, we are STILL rebuilding.

Doesn't matter, he's not the one with a no trade clause and he isn't retiring. If he got traded to Carolina he goes like everyone else does unless they retire, which again he isnt' doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again my order of preference is:

1- Watson

2- Trade up for Zach Wilson (will likely have to be with NYJ)

3- Trade up for Trey Lance (probably with Miami)

4- Trade up for Justin Fields (probably with Miami)

5- Stafford on a reasonable deal (i.e. a second round pick is the max I would give)

6-Stay put at 8 and draft a LT, trade Teddy away to one of these teams jonesing for a QB and wait till next year. 

 

we VERY much could be looking at option 6. Before you light your torches this is not what I want but if we can't do 1-5 we don't really have a choice. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...