Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jamarr chase at 8?


RIPTreyLance
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't really want either one.

I remember everyone cheering when Ryan Grigson and the Colts kept drafting weapons for Andrew Luck while ignoring the offensive line. People were wishing we used that approach.

Look what happened there.

If we don’t go Sewell or slater at 8 I am going to lose my mind.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't really want either one.

I remember everyone cheering when Ryan Grigson and the Colts kept drafting weapons for Andrew Luck while ignoring the offensive line. People were wishing we used that approach.

Look what happened there.

What weapons did they draft for Luck exactly. He had T.Y. Hilton and that's about it. They drafted two tight ends the same year they drafted Luck but they didn't draft a difference-maker for him at all when he was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If we don’t go Sewell or slater at 8 I am going to lose my mind.  

If Sewell is there I don’t think you can pass on him...it would also mean Pitts and Chase are likely gone. 
 

Slater? Not so Sure...it’d be hard to pass on Chase or Pitts for Slater imo. You could draft Alex Leatherwood outside the top 10 and maybe end up with a better player. 
 

Sewell imo is the tackle in the top 10...I’m not sold on anyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Hear me out. I know we never invest in left tackles and this is a prime opportunity to do so, but if Kyle pitts and Penei Sewell are gone, would anyone really be MAD about picking Chase? By all accounts he's the best prospect we've seen since julio. 

Can you truly be mad taking Julio Jones at 8?

 

No GIF

We already have DJ to pay coming up as well as Robby if he stays consistent. Both young and talented 1k receivers. Or Chase could be the next OBJ thats a talented headcase like TO. How many rings has TO, OBJ or Julio won?

It's like if your Madden WR position rating was an 80, would a move to raise it to 85 that much of a difference? Or would you rather raise your Oline or Corner overall average from a 50 to a 70? Something startable that wont get your QB killed so he has time to throw to those wide receivers. I'd rather raise the whole teams average than just make one position raise a few points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, blueandblackattack said:

No GIF

We already have DJ to pay coming up as well as Robby if he stays consistent. Both young and talented 1k receivers. Or Chase could be the next OBJ thats a talented headcase like TO. How many rings has TO, OBJ or Julio won?

It's like if your Madden WR position rating was an 80, would a move to raise it to 85 that much of a difference? Or would you rather raise your Oline or Corner overall average from a 50 to a 70? Something startable that wont get your QB killed so he has time to throw to those wide receivers. I'd rather raise the whole teams average than just make one position raise a few points.

We could have 3 WR who go over 1,000 receiving yards easily. This would be much better then what we had with curtis. Man! I just don't wanna take someone who's average. I know we have needs.. I just want a slam dunk. I'm not sold on slater so imo if Sewell is gone we need to take BPA... Everything will work itself out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't really want either one.

I remember everyone cheering when Ryan Grigson and the Colts kept drafting weapons for Andrew Luck while ignoring the offensive line. People were wishing we used that approach.

Look what happened there.

Ryan Grigson's biggest problem wasn't just which specific positions he was selecting but that he was an awful evaluator of talent period. To apply a well this is what Ryan Grigson did and it didn't work out label to every mock that doesn't have us taking a left tackle is silliness. Fitterer could be great or he could be a dud we won't know for a few years but Seattle hasn't exactly been known for stellar drafts as of late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Ryan Grigson's biggest problem wasn't just which specific positions he was selecting but that he was an awful evaluator of talent period. To apply a well this is what Ryan Grigson did and it didn't work out label to every mock that doesn't have us taking a left tackle is silliness. Fitterer could be great or he could be a dud we won't know for a few years but Seattle hasn't exactly been known for stellar drafts as of late.

Grigson's just one convenient example. There are plenty of teams that have added skill players while half-assing the offensive line.

One of them currently has a very disgruntled quarterback because of it.

And yes, the fact that we got our GM from that team does worry me a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The biggest problem we've had with this team since Rivera left is that we have become progressively more timid. Certainly on offense, but mostly on defense.  Football is not a finesse sport. It isn't gentlemanly. You don't want to kill or injure opposing players, but it is essential that you knock them hard enough to intimidate them or at least make them pensive about every move they make.  We used to be those guys. And we haven't been for a very long time.  So, I hope Dan and Dave can bring us back to this. We need it. And a tough, hard hitting team always gives you a shot, even when you might not have the finesse talent on the field.  Yes, it is a passing league, but scared or addled receivers and QBs change the whole game. We need our grit back. We've been a bunch of neutered Persian cats for too long.
    • A couple of notable insights I gained from this:  - Diontae Johnson seems eager to help Bryce progress in his career - Clowney is happy to be back home - Luke is essentially a FO spokesperson - Dan says he would've liked to have added more talent in the draft, and he seems eager to scour the waver wire for other team's cuts. It's easy to read into his statements that this roster rebuild is nowhere near complete in his eyes.
    • Keeping fit is something that many people overlook until they are out of shape and therefore must work harder to reach their physical goals. However, the work put into keeping your body healthy is worth it in both immediate results and long-term benefits. Here are some tips on fitness that can help keep you happy and healthy for years to come. Set up your weightlifting routine around your fitness goals. If you are trying to create large, bulky muscle you'll want to do more weight, but with longer rest periods between sets and between workouts. If you are trying to develop lean muscles with high endurance, you want to lift less weight, but do it more often and with shorter rest times. If you're a person who likes to walk for your daily dose of exercise, make sure you bend your elbows while you're walking. Doing this will make you swing your arms faster and in turn you'll move your legs faster. Not only will you either finish your work out sooner or go further, but you'll burn even more calories while you're doing it! Must Read:   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/f44bd9d4-20c6-4533-9af8-d43fc7b4bf69   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/144a2195-1911-442c-89b2-e27f63691cf5   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/d4e289c5-9e26-4821-baf0-81952d4e7292   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/566584fa-c321-4111-903e-4134e5e9be6a   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/c488dcb1-fc92-4691-b53b-03565fda2f60   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/761382bb-3f2a-478e-8495-9e971d3967c8   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/019ba212-a883-4148-ad89-309e98374b43   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/eb65b3fb-fd04-49d9-828c-8f1470aae23c   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/d8dd8aba-81f5-4da7-8eb2-c1a2945f5de7   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/ddd0cb7d-988b-4139-8231-bdad2e80d61b   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/61036578-8b2b-4b3d-95ef-0dfac659ecef   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/ddc36234-6d56-412b-aa4f-212d85b49a9f   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/b7a3eb22-8e12-4cf1-a365-2707042597be   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/47e01437-983a-4766-8c12-ae10f542923b   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/1c21a6d8-386f-478c-b9d9-c2e4889cb43f   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/a8d56631-0ca0-4457-803f-b88f3f352609   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/2d406da1-03e1-45cf-aae0-985e4a2cd8ae   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/7ab1f6c2-10da-4e01-b7c4-6d3d39fcfd11   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/1d5e6dcf-c841-4080-89cc-7021265f3cb3   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/de925c52-2eab-4196-85e1-6044fee1b943   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/1c6f60c3-43b7-4d7d-9596-0767d87b3fd8   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/ff8a7082-56b1-4fea-9671-27930fe94f74   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/b63663d6-32dc-468c-9edb-8c43c29af350   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/2a358ec4-2c33-46a0-9fa2-8dabd11ee409   https://manifold.ecds.emory.edu/groups/c48c3398-2532-488e-ae39-8d0490fd6877  
×
×
  • Create New...