Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prediction : Joe Brady is a low scoring loss to Atlanta away from losing play calling responsibilities.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Is he supposed to catch balls for the receivers? Sam has been missing throws and receivers have been dropping decent throws. I'm not trying to completely absolve Brady of any and all blame, but we could have an absolute prodigy at OC and it wouldn't make much of a difference with the way our players are executing. All the OC can do is out them on position to make a play. At the end of the day the players still have to make the play.

Execution isn't all on Brady but it seems that players are out of position frequently and I wouldn't be surprised if they were sometimes running the wrong routes (this has been commented on once in a while in broadcasts).  It doesn't seem that Brady is properly preparing the offense at all. Sure, Darnold makes EVERYTHING worse... But still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

It makes wonder why the hell they didn’t get a vet NFL coach as an assistant to help guide the chess game they would be having against other coaches. 

It’s like they all collectively didn’t ever consider the adjustment aspect of game planning.  Their clueless reaction to the past few weeks are telling to this.

He should’ve spent a few more days fishing with Jimmy Johnson.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted

It turns out that Joe Burrow, Justin Jefferson, and Jamar Chase are really really good and the players you’re coaching may matter more than the play calls. 
 

Prediction:

Panthers will continue to have the same mediocre players at the most important positions and no matter the coaching from Brady or Rhule…until it gets fixed they’ll be mediocre. 
 

Get a pro bowl caliber QB, LT and maybe Brady’s play calls look better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Say this 10x over. NFL isn't college ball. 

NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 
NFL isn't college ball. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, KeithCuddi said:

It's not even his fault. Sam is so bad he can't even take the layup plays. There's no way for Joe Brady's offense to work with ghost brains at the helm.

So why does he refuse to run the ball to at least prevent interceptions? Royce has been averaging 5-6 yards a carry and can't get on the field 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ichigo1057 Experienced

ichigo1057

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Get a pro bowl caliber QB, LT and maybe Brady’s play calls look better.

A single LT ain't going to do much for this OLine giving all the trash on it. More like a center and guards since the whole interior on our line play like they are ghost, people go right through them no problem.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...