Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy B I’m sorry, it wasn’t all your fault!


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Teddy was trash. I’d still take Darnold over him. But he wasn’t the only problem. 

Ha.. This Sam Darnold quarterbacked team is some of the worst Panther football I've ever seen and I've watched nearly all of them. 

We were in every game last season even though we had a rookie coaching staff and undermanned talent wise. Teddy was the reason for that. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that teddy isn’t the long term answer for any franchise, but he is capable of keeping an offence moving.

big criticism when he was here was the inability to get in the endzone… so far he’s on track to double his TD output he had with us.

Not clamouring for his return or being apologetic for him, but this is yet more evidence that our HC/OC combo can’t plan a proficient game plan, call effective plays on game day etc.

 

first TB and now Darnold, so far both QBs started ok, then massively tailed off as the season progressed. Not only that we are getting less out of them than their previous (and next) teams have.

Im convinced we have a HC/OC > QB order of priority to fix right now.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KSpan said:

Denver also has the #3 defense by scoring in the NFL and caught Dallas on their worst day. Teddy and the Broncos have had their clocks cleaned by every other competent team they've faced, noting that garbage time have made things look closer than a few actually were (Dallas today included), and barely snuck by WFT. 

What does this mean? That Teddy is exactly who we know him to be, a middling QB who can avoid losing games when things are perfect around him but can't/won't elevate the team to rise to the level of higher competition. He's having a much better year than Sam, sure, but Carolina wouldn't be going anywhere with him and this staff except to perhaps a wild card loss. 

I'm not going to say that watching Carolina lose is a good thing because this is pretty awful, but it will be worth it if it exposes the emperor's lack of clothes and gets things on the right track. I will say I'm 100% with Jawny that last year was more than enough of Bridgewater's milquetoast BS when things mattered the most. Good riddance.

...just "sling it" baby...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Because even if Sam is playing worse now (and I’m not denying that he is) he still doesn’t play that infuriating chicken poo style of football that Bridgewater plays, with his wobbly floaters and passes anywhere but square and in stride. 

Like Dirty Harry says, "A man's gotta know his limitations." Darnold obviously doesn't know his. Give me a competitive game of football over a trainwreck any day. Darnold doesn't have the aptitude to be a signal caller! He hasn't shown the competency to even be a game manager because his decision-making is abysmal. No way I'd rather watch Darnold! 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Like Dirty Harry says, "A man's gotta know his limitations." Darnold obviously doesn't know his. Give me a competitive game of football over a trainwreck any day. Darnold doesn't have the aptitude to be a signal caller! He hasn't shown the competency to even be a game manager because his decision-making is abysmal. No way I'd rather watch Darnold! 

Yeah, anyone who would willingly choose this as an option is fuging nuts.

Most frustrating offense to watch since Pickles.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Urrymonster2 said:

Agree that teddy isn’t the long term answer for any franchise, but he is capable of keeping an offence moving.

big criticism when he was here was the inability to get in the endzone… so far he’s on track to double his TD output he had with us.

Not clamouring for his return or being apologetic for him, but this is yet more evidence that our HC/OC combo can’t plan a proficient game plan, call effective plays on game day etc.

 

first TB and now Darnold, so far both QBs started ok, then massively tailed off as the season progressed. Not only that we are getting less out of them than their previous (and next) teams have.

Im convinced we have a HC/OC > QB order of priority to fix right now.

This to me stuck in my mind as a great summary. I agree with you in the order you have listed regarding HC/OC> QB . It's sad at this point but I feel like leadership is to blame now and not as much on Teddy or Sam. Teddy or Sam aren't great but I feel like our coaches are not putting them in position to be successful or even marginal middle of the pack QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, anyone who would willingly choose this as an option is fuging nuts.

Most frustrating offense to watch since Pickles.

As frustrating as Teddy was to watch, it definitely wasn't all his fault.  It's also not all Darnold's fault either.

I think Joe Brady is in over his head.  He's just not ready to be an NFL coordinator yet.  What he did with LSU was trememdous.  But he didn't call the plays.  And that LSU team was most definitely stacked.  Justin Jefferson and Ja'Marr Chase against college competition is just UNFAIR.

We've definitely made poor decisions at QB.  But it wasn't all them either.  We just aren't right on that side of the ball, despite having perhaps the best set of skill position players we've ever had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...