Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers plan on meeting with Cam


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Poor PJ. Second week in a row where he is slated to start, and then we pull the rug out beneath him. I can't imagine how frustrating that can be as a player in any professional sport.

He must be really bad or the offense would be limited to the number of plays that he can run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

no way. they see this as being half a game out of the playoffs trying to save jobs.

Maybe.  I’d love to see Cam.   But I don’t trust Tepper and Rhule at this stage.  

but I’d go buy some really nice tickets for that WFT game if Cam returned.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rmoneyg35 said:

Isn’t the problem with cam that he can’t throw over 20 yards because of his shoulder injury? I mean you can say the patriots had no WRs last year but they still had a decent Offensive line. His throwing stats were bad. He threw a high completion percentage but that’s because he threw a bunch of short passes. His td to int ratio sucked.

They put him in a box. He did what he was told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Fright said:

Tepp with the big balls move. Swallowed his pride and went with a great option and a fan favorite, but maybe it’s all for PR.

Hope is restored… a bit.

 Win or lose with Cam he needed to win the fan base back and right the wrong for letting him go. This is a revitalization and honestly I think means one of the coaches is on the way out. Even if we are bad  and draft a Qb next year at least Cam will be there to groom him and hopefully win one with us in the next 3 years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I admit I was wrong about Tepper and Rhule swallowing their pride.

Second, reading this thread has shown me some of you have bigger emotional and mental issues than I thought.

Third, this team is as rudderless as a politician running for office and changing direction as the wind blows. Pick a direction and stick to it. It's either a complete rebuild or it's not. This team has always been mediocre, but now seems to be moving into ringling bros circus GIF by Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey territory

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...