Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alright screw it, take Pickett


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

What a dumb idea..

Not only are we risking Pickett being good at all .. The only upside is we get Andy Dalton or Derek Carr at best...smh

If the idea is you're taking a swing then Wills is the upside big swing play...

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 QBs played well behind shitty lines in college this past year. Howell and Willis. Howell will probably be ready to start sooner with a higher floor, and Willis has the highest ceiling of any QB in the draft. Dream scenario would be trade down and draft one of these two… 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Growl said:

I’m really not opposed to taking the big swing at a Corrall or Willow at QB but I really don’t think Pickett necessarily has to be the high floor/ low ceiling type he’s represented as.

My pup Willow would approve

A0C49D6C-03AC-4CDD-8921-AEFECC2D6A8B.thumb.jpeg.69826cbb16739e15c41ee96d171a0bb3.jpeg

Edited by davos
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I encourage you to go back and watch his college play. Notice how he immediately backpedals to 10 yards behind the LOS on almost every snap. You can't do that in the NFL. Your OTs have no chance of keeping those freak show edge rushers off of you. You can't create a pocket that deep. Bryce can chuck it when he has an airport runway in front of him to step up into. There's a reason why "ease of creating velocity" is such a talking point evaluating QBs. It's not how hard or how far you can throw the ball given a perfect situation. It's how hard and how far you can throw the ball in a typical NFL game situation and that's where a lot of my concerns with Bryce were going into the draft. There were way too many plays in his college tape that if you were watching that purely in terms of translating it to the NFL it just didn't work.
    • Yeah, like I said I get it. From a revenue perspective I'm not a good customer for them. They've probably intentionally tanked offline franchise mode to try to get people online. Again, not a terrible strategy from a pure business perspective. I can't really be mad at them for doing what's good for business but yeah, from my perspective it still sucks.
    • Ok let me be more specific. Smith was a stud before Newton got here do you not agree? Yes, LaFell improved under Cam but then had his best years after leaving the Panthers with Cam as the QB and going to NE. So he improved playing with someone else. Olsen was in Chicage the year before Cam arrived and statistically had the same numbers his first year with Cam.  Hope that's clearer for you.
×
×
  • Create New...