Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want Deshaun NOW?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

this would immediately put us atop of a very weak division for a LONG TIME. This is a proven quarterback, who is fully rested, and hopefully has learned a valuable lesson about the purchase power of prostitutes (aka hire someone specifically for the happy ending, dummy)

This is a local kid that will immediately generate more heat and noise than anything we could possibly ask for, and it will put (clemson) butts in seats.

Those of you who can't stomach it, I totally understand.

but I can't stomach the thought of Jimmy G, Mitchy T or whatever mediocre QB we have to slog through for the next 5 years to even get close to finding someone of this talent.

So yeah. Let's get him. I don't care what the draft capital is. I Don't care if it sells our soul. I'm ready for a winning team and this is our best shot at getting there anytime soon.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would. No charges were filed so I’ll respect that. However I personally think men who pay for sex are weak. It would be annoying to have the face of the franchise be a dweeb who has to pay to get his pee pee touched 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Yes.

he’s a proven commodity  and first round picks used on QBs are lottery tickets.  
 

 

Ehhhh, if your franchise can’t find a QB that can compete with three+ first and seconds, plus more first for any decent player…I don’t feel trading it all away to forgo any guess work (and to other extent ineptness) is going  to take care of the root cause anyways.

I guess we could always do it and hope for a compete team in 4-5 years and pray Watson doesn’t get butthurt and leave and also still plays at a high level.

poo at the rate Rhule is going now it may be fastest. But the hope is to move on to something better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Zod said:

So he is not a criminal as far as the law is concerned.

 

Would you accept him on the team now?

Nah.  2 reasons. 

1.  He cost too much and we aren’t a QB away like the Rams or Tampa when they signed Stafford/Brady.  

2. He has 22 civil cases out there.  Who wants to pull for a QB while that is dragged out for years and likely through the media? And we have no clue how gross and bad that info will look.  
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want him here. There's still 22 civil suits pending. I expect him to settle those to make them go away. I wouldn't let my kid go to Michael Jackson's house or be an alter boy for the Catholic church. Just because you didn't get convicted doesn't mean your innocent. OJ was found guilty civilly, innocent in criminal. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...