Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are OUT of the Watson race


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, ENCPantherfan2 said:

Even Steve Smith said don't do it. That's one dude you should always listen to.

And it would’ve been fine if we were just smart from the start to not get involved. Instead Tepper went all in on him and now we just look like the most dysfunctional organization in all of pro sports

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Baskinridge said:

I was really starting to worry we could jeopardize our last place standing in the division.
 

Should be safe now

AFC west is an absolute monster!! Easily getting swept this year.. even if Watson wanted to come here.. the o-line is poo.. he would look like Darnold back there but he wouldn’t see Ghosts!! Frustrating but I think Watson give his full heart to Carolina and pull some crap like he did at Houston.. wanting out!! Think it’s a blessing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

This is just rationalizing cope. If the people who are really about it, they would stop rooting for the panthers regardless if we landed watson or not, period. I got no problem with people doing that.  But all this fake outrage while you still support the panthers who actively pursued this guy for over a year is just hypocrisy. And I honestly don’t care about that either if people would just stop guilt tripping others on some sort of moral high ground. I’ve stated why I was fine with this. Football is just entertainment for me. I leave morality for the real stakes.

Fake outrage? I don’t have a problem with anyone who wanted him. I would have still supported the Panthers regardless. I wish the best for him, hope he can rehabilitate his image. Many others have expressed the same sentiments. I regret you feel like I was criticizing those who thought differently, not my intent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fix o line and o line depth 

run it back with cam or darnold whoever wins in camp

draft a qb next draft 

profit

the solution is too easy for the fo to mess up but I got a feeling they will 

we were never DW’s first choice and with Rhule and his clown show he ran the last 7 weeks of the season, there wasn’t a way I saw DW ignoring that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...