Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

POLL: What Will It Take For You To Be OK With Keeping Rhule?

travisura

By travisura,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

What will it take for you to be OK with having Rhule return next season? (Anonymous)  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. What will it take for you to be OK with having Rhule return next season? (Anonymous)

    • I want him back regardless of record
      4
    • 9 or more wins
      37
    • Make the playoffs
      61
    • Win the Super Bowl
      9
    • I want him gone regardless of record
      27

Recommended Posts

aahainley Enthusiast

aahainley

Posted
Posted

Anger/annoyance aside, I’d say playoffs or 9 wins. He has not been a good NFL coach. He has proven to be a good college coach. For me, the most important part will be showing improvement. That can be improvement on the basis of wins or showing better judgement towards players, coaches, and just mentality towards the game as a whole. If I see good improvement that shows learning, I’m okay with keeping him as long as he continues to be reassessed. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, thefuzz said:

He will need to make the playoffs, while making the roster continue to get better each and every week.

Starting fast, only to run out of gas after 5 games....he's a goner.

He doesn't have to win a playoff game, but he needs to be competitive.

This is a good point. The schedule going to be really key, especially when the Tampa games are. Rhule needs a good December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, trueblade said:

This is a good point. The schedule going to be really key, especially when the Tampa games are. Rhule needs a good December.

The team needs to look good week in and week out.  I understand that everyone...even the best can poo the bed...but he needs 12 good to great games, not 3 good games.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted

After watching Ron Rivera become Riverboat Ron and seemingly change his ways only to revert back to who he was and has always been, there’s literally nothing this guy can do this year to convince me he’ll be any good for the next 5-10. There’s a reason the saying exists “A leopard can’t change his spots.” Beware the fleeting hot seat changes we may see in Rhule this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RenoCarolina Proficient

RenoCarolina

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Improvement and 9 wins. That is the bar and is fair and also achievable. It’s put up or shut up time. 

Anything less, he needs to be canned immediately.

I voted same.  But with the state of the NFC versus the AFC I need to change to playoffs if not deep run into playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...