Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers have first round grades on 3 QBs.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Alcoholic headcase that's battling depression.   Hard pass.   Why sign up for this headache?

There are football discussions and then there is this verbal diarrhea. People like you are why many others do not open up about depression. What a dick.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Alcoholic headcase that's battling depression.   Hard pass.   Why sign up for this headache?

Wtf are you talking about? Do you know the guy personally or something? We would all do well to not take what the media says as gospel.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stbugs said:

I’m not either and based on our real talent level, taking a QB in 2022 if you think they are all meh is a problem. We aren’t a compete now team so either you think these guys can be franchise guys or not. Settling for Corral if you think he’s third best in a mediocre QB class is a waste of a 1st round pick. He doesn’t become a better QB because we got a couple day 2 picks to go with him.

There are two dumb things we can do:

1) Trade down to pick QB3 because QB1/QB2 aren’t better enough. To me you don’t pick a QB that you settled for, if you trade down and can still get Penning and day 2 picks, cool. Do not be a team that trades down to get a QB. We aren’t finding Russell Wilson.

2) Go QB in 2022 because we feel like we have to instead of adding more talent (not 1 year deal talent) and going all out in a better QB year.

Seems like we are willing to do 1) and that’s moronic and just gets us into the well, we tried Teddy, Sam and Cam and now Kenny, who’s next?

I genuinely can't look past Charles Cross at #6, regardless of who else is on the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Zod said:

Maybe. I think the Panthers may prefer taking Corral and getting a second and third rounder with the trade back 

Probably the least damaging plan if we're determined to get a QB.

Still would rather us go LT, but I'm resigned to the idea that we're getting a QB.

Got a feeling that they'll go the "safe" route and get Pickett, but he's got the lowest ceiling of any of them. He'll be ok and probably take the least development initially as a rookie, but he won't ever get much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Probably the least damaging plan if we're determined to get a QB.

Still would rather us go LT, but I'm resigned to the idea that we're getting a QB.

Got a feeling that they'll go the "safe" route and get Pickett, but he's got the lowest ceiling of any of them. He'll be ok and probably take the least development initially as a rookie, but he won't ever get much better.

I just think they are really being transparent and desperate--that can't be a good thing on draft day.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

These types of posts always confuse me. That's what this place is for, to talk about football. If encountering differing opinions on football is so triggering for you, why bother with being here?

 

"Triggered" is a wee bit hyperbolic. Perhaps I could have used a more politically correct phrase than "beginning to sound like mouth breathers", I'll admit, but I stand by the fact that nobody ultimately knows which off these QBs will be the best, or how they'll compare to other players at other positions in this draft.

Within the discussion of football, there is also a place for moderation (excuse, the pun). 

I don't mind differing opinions at all, but I believe that people should actually base those differing opinions on something, and realize (not necessarily acknowledge) that it is an opinion and deliver it as such. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Probably the least damaging plan if we're determined to get a QB.

Still would rather us go LT, but I'm resigned to the idea that we're getting a QB.

Got a feeling that they'll go the "safe" route and get Pickett, but he's got the lowest ceiling of any of them. He'll be ok and probably take the least development initially as a rookie, but he won't ever get much better.

Why do you feel like he won't get much better?

If he's taken this year he's going to inherit a much better situation than Darnold or any rookie would have had in 2021:, new and experienced OC, new O-lineman, and one of the best O-line coaches in football. Pickett has good arm strength & good athletic ability.

I can see how some can say a players physical abilities can limit their peak for certain positions (CB, RB, WR, etc) but I've never understood how someone (not just you) can say a "QB" cannot get any better". The great QB's get better because they learn the game and thing slow down for them on the field.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
Posted

I mean a team may want to trade up for more than just a QB. The LTs are ridiculous according to everybody, you have the best safety in a generation according to some, and you have some decent pass rushers and wide receivers. A trade back is not out of the question.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...