Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terrace Marshall Jr is the standout in this minicamp


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, BrianS said:

He had a lot of snaps, but wasn't truly "used".

Last season he had 422 offensive snaps but only 30 targets.  This with CMC out and not soaking up a bunch of targets.  Worse yet, of his 30 targets, 22 of them (and 14 of his 17 receptions) happened in the first six weeks prior to the concussion.

 

Probably didn't want anymore hospital balls tossed his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Of all the coaches of the Rhule era, Brady will have the best future.

he sure didnt do much for his case these past two seasons... based on the evidence, I highly doubt it. However, I will be more than happy to eat crow if he amounts to anything in this league.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Of all the coaches of the Rhule era, Brady will have the best future.

Well he’s the QB Coach of a top 3 superstar QB in Josh Allen, that just might be the cushiest job in the NFL. He’s basically your little brother you give an unplugged PlayStation controller to and say “You’re doing a great job buddy!! Way to go!!!”. If he can’t finesse a halfway decent career out of this? Oof…then “oh wee mayne” as you crazy kids say.

Meanwhile Rhule and his coaching staff are in all likelihood out of jobs by the end of the season. I think firing Brady may have actually ended up being the thing that salvaged his NFL career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

Maybe I'm misremembering but didnt he look really good in the offseason activities last year as well?

He did - and he also had a great preseason.  I’m hoping the system was the main issue.  Rhule made an interesting comment yesterday that last years system was designed to focus on one primary target.  If that’s true that is stupid 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think brady was more the solution than the problem. We lost a lot of games and looked bad but that was probably due to the team assembled. you asking a chef to make 5 star meal with ingredients you got from circle K. You Cam Erving tearing it up. The rotating door at guard and center. And no cmc?

Yes blame the offensive coordinator he's not getting it done we want results!!

Edited by micnificent28
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Personally I think brady was more the solution than the problem. We lost a lot of games and looked bad but that was probably due to the team assembled. you asking a chef to make 5 star meal with ingredients you got from circle K. You Cam Erving tearing it up. The rotating door at guard and center. And no cmc?

Yes blame the offensive coordinator he's not getting it done we want results!!

I seem to remember plenty of comments from announcers and analysts that our routes were predictable.  I remember one talking about the bad route tree concept as they were too shallow.  I think a lot of that falls on Brady.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...