Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Moore Stops Fight At Fan Fest


Butterflyj30
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, RJK said:

This is why u couldn’t pay me to attend a game. Too many grown ass men who still act like they’re in high school all gassed up on alcohol 

This. NFL Football is my #1 favorite sport. And you couldn't pay me enough to go and attend a live game. It's a miserable experience if you're actually trying to see the game, and 100% of the games I've attended included embarrassing drunken belligerence. The last game I went to was a pre-season game up here in Baltimore and I saw a very drunk Ravens fan punch out a very drunk female Panthers fan, and I was straight up Peter Griffon "Done!" gif with the whole in person "experience" at that point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RJK said:

This is why u couldn’t pay me to attend a game. Too many grown ass men who still act like they’re in high school all gassed up on alcohol 

I was at a panthers game a few years back (in Charlotte, mind you) and I was in line for a beer.  I complimented the woman’s hat in front of me, it was a cool Panthers beanie I hadn’t seen before.  Her drunk af boyfriend literally tackled me to the ground because he saw I was talking to his girl.  She was super embarrassed and they left.  Only bad experience I’ve had, but it left a bad taste in my mouth.  Or maybe that was just the blood

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, RJK said:

This is why u couldn’t pay me to attend a game. Too many grown ass men who still act like they’re in high school all gassed up on alcohol 


I hate attending games in person. 80% if the time some idiot ruins it for me.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RJK said:

This is why u couldn’t pay me to attend a game. Too many grown ass men who still act like they’re in high school all gassed up on alcohol 

Fwiw, I attend 1-2 games a year, and have yet to see a fight in person.  Of course, I usually sit in the upper level.  By the time most of us make that climb, they are physically unable to fight.  🙂

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

thats just the theme of the NFL and a snapshot of the huddle as well

 

typical low lives that rely on a sports team to supplement for their identity, and when the team isnt good it makes them emotionally disturbed. man children. 

It was like Tinderbox interactions but in person.  😷

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

thats just the theme of the NFL and a snapshot of the huddle as well

 

typical low lives that rely on a sports team to supplement for their identity, and when the team isnt good it makes them emotionally disturbed. man children. 

some of that.  I also think there is an element that is similar to the Chucky Cheese brawl scenarios.  I was listening to a psychologist talk about it.  

Fanfest isn't a great example as it is largely a free event.  But basically, the premise is you have a bunch of people that (spend X on tickets, overpriced beer, etc) and they frankly can't afford to be doing such.   And basically, it creates stressed out ticking timebombs that are easily set off. 

I'd take my kids to a Clemson game before I would a Panther game if picking between the two.  Atmosphere is better in college overall I think.  But not a fan of taking young kids anywhere where a bunch of random drunk adults are having fun.  Frankly, I don't enjoy going to games much anymore.  I don't really drink outside of token drink with a meal or at a social event.  Drunks of all ages just aren't fun to be around.  I prefer my home or a friends home....with a great view on the TV at this stage of my life.  Nowhere better to actually watch a game than at home thanks to tech/replay/etc. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is Guy 1 is a random Panthers' fan who casually watches the games every year who probably quietly uttered something like "I'm excited about our team this year" and Guy 2 is a Huddler from the other side of the stadium who somehow heard him and SPRINTED across the entire field to spit in his face and blast him for being a bootlicking POS who gargles the FO's nutsack.

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...