Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

Y’all are so dumb thinking we’d get a first. Some said multiple firsts lol

glad he’s gone. Build this team the right way. Around a qb NOT a rb. 

Hopefully these weirdos who rode his dick will jump ship to San Fran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Outstanding trade. Finally this team At least has a plan. Keep it going. Trade burns for a first. Get a 2nd for Moore. See if anyone will take shaq.

Tear this down and make everyone available outside ickey and horn.

You want to trade two more young blue chip players just to use those picks to TRY to replace said players?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

Why do we never win trades? I don’t get it. Since I’ve been a panthers fan, It seems like we always get the raw end. Trading up for Everett, trading up for Otah, trading 2nd for Darnold, trading this , trading that.

When we trade things of actual value, like the a top 5 offensive weapon in football, late second, late third, late fourth. Why? Why can’t we have a bigger pair of balls and either fleece someone or just do the logical thing and use him like you did on that first drive against the Rams. Get a real, big, back that you trust and have him run between the tackles. No. Instead of fleece ourselves and end up with stupidly late picks that won’t become difference makers. Just when you think the organization can’t get worse.

Greg Olsen trade was a massive win

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

For an injury prone rb with a massive contract..  that's a hell of a trade by fit

He's not an injury prone RB.

He had 2 injuries in consecutive seasons that he likely could have played through more if we were a contending team, but we weren't so they took the time, it didn't quite heal up, and they shut him down.

Also thinking of him as an RB is the problem, he's being used wrong, he needs to be a Slot WR used, ironically in the Deebo way, and get 8-10 carries a game still.  Then his contract isn't a problem and his injury risk is reduced, he's about to dominate in SF.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

He's probably happy as hell. I can't imagine.

Seriously. I imagine most of our top guys have all asked for outies. This is a perfect opportunity. If I was Burns I’d be like, adios. I’m not re-signing, gonna check out the market and see what a good organization feels like to play for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...