Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So I'm done....

rayzor

By rayzor,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I have no more interest or curiosity in the Wilks experiment. 

Barring a trip to the NFC conference championship,im just not interested in seeing anymore from this team with Wilks at the helm. Better than Rhule, yes. Not good enough.

Until we can hire a new breed of coach, I'm done with this team. No more getting outclassed, out coached, and out performed by bad teams.

Sorry (not) I have standards beyond "the players like him and he's a local product."

I want more for this team than Wilks can deliver.

  • Pie 37
  • Beer 6
  • The D 1
  • Flames 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newtcase Mentor

Newtcase

Posted
Posted

Pittsburgh probably chuckling so hard at our “identity” in the post game locker room.  A complete team doesn’t need an “identity”, they adapt to the weakness presented.  We approached this game with the same plan we took to Seattle and Tomlin had his team ready for it.  We had no more chess moves once that was obvious.  
 

It was an embarrassing defensive performance.  I can’t recall being beat to the edge so often.  Tackling was a huge issue throughout the game.  Put Taylor in hopeless positions throughout the game.

 

 Overall, I just didn’t see the team really given an opportunity to compete.  Never went tempo, abysmal lack of screens, ran the predictable play over and over.  A vanilla game plan exposed.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • UnluckyforSome
      NBC Sports 2026 NFL GM rankings

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • tukafan21
      Joe Person: Panthers are NOT expected to extend Bryce Young before the 2026 season

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • strato
      Brown on BY9 while talking to Chris Long

      By strato · Posted

      I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...