-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By PNW_PantherMan · Posted
I would have preferred more of a technically strong WR, but they were obviously in love with the guy. I don't hate the move up 1 slot, as it costs almost nothing. The 5th year option is kind of whatever though. It could end up being useful, but there's a good chance its not. If Legette is a star, he's going to be extended before that 5 year. And if he's a bust, he isn't gonna make it that long. -
That is mostly wrong and let me tell you why. Shenault is no where in the vicinity as far as playing speed. He doesn't have near the acceleration. But...the main reason why they are different is that Shenault has poor ball tracking skills, while X has exceptional ball tracking skills, which consequently allows him to win those 50-50 balls. It also means that X is a legitimate threat down field, but Shenault is relegated to plays within five yards of the line of scrimmage. So X will be able to do what Shenault can, but Shenault can't do what X can. -
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.