Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Bucs GameDay Thread!

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jopie87 Veteran

jopie87

Posted
Posted
Just now, pantherj said:

I will never forget those Evan's TDs. We would have won had we been smart, and that's not hindsight. I was screaming to watch out and get safety help over there.

Those 3 TD's likely play a huge role in him not getting retained. Failure to adjust and give Brady the same look is inexcusable.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't blame Wilks much for this given what he was left with on the corners.

He has called the game like pre-Riverboat Ron era; i.e. embarrassingly conservative to the point where it loses you games. There are other issues but it really comes down to the general mentality the team has had of playing not to lose. That's all on him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

I mean let's be honest, who DIDN'T see this coming? Y'all have been following the Panthers long enough to know how this one was going to turn out lol

And in true Panther fashion, we win just enough games to lose out on a top 3 pick, and lose just enough to miss the playoffs LMAO

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, CPantherKing said:

Is that 3 or 4 losses with the Panthers trying to win on a final drive with Ekwonu going full fail with his pass blocking?

You mean a rookie LT who was raw at pass protection has some issues in the NFL on obvious passing downs? I don’t believe it! Impossible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
33inNC Mentor

33inNC

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

If I’m Horn, I’m asking for a massive contract. It’s clear that this defense is poo without him. He literally locks down half the field.

Yea, then they'll show him how much he is hurt.  Cannot pay someone top dollar for playing half the games.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...