Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks Set This Team Back


Recommended Posts

Had we hung on to The Process to secure probably a #3-5 draft pick (I doubt we were outsucking the Texans or Bears, probably not the Broncos or Cardinals, either), we would be a friggin mess right now of epic proportions.  We honestly would probably be about to hire a Wilks/Rivera type coach just to stop the bleeding.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Man, some of y'all are just laying all the blame at Steve Wilks feet like he spent the past three seasons setting this up.  Also, Steve didn't make the trade decisions.  Why would the INTERM coach do that?  How is Steve Wilks to blame for SF playing well and lowering the value of those picks?  How is Wilks responsible for Horn's injury?  I mean, the timing sucked, but so does the timing of all injuries in the NFL.  Save a lot of your vitriol for Scott Fitterer.

Perspective: when was the last time you cared about late season Panthers football?  2017?  It's been a good ride here.  I'd rather win than lose because a few draft slots are pretty meaningless.  Look, if we find THE GLORIOUS QB-SAVIOR, we can trade up for him.  Duh.  That's what teams do.

Given the drafting pedigree of this team, would you rather have Brian Burns or 2-4 players who will not be as good as he is now?  This year, the Rams suck so that traded draft pick is looking good.  What about in 24-25?  I think the Rams bounce back.  Look at what happened when they put Baker in there?  So at best I imagine those picks are middle first round, or later if they go back to the playoffs.

I don't know what's going on in David Tepper's brain.  I don't know who the next coach will be.  I like that Wilks brought organization, toughness, and heart to the team.  He was the anti-Rhule and it showed.  Sunday versus the Saints will be what it will be.  I know the team will try to win, and I'm fine with that.

Some of y'all live in a Madden/Fantasy Football world.  

And that's what we needed :  an Anti-Rhule type of coach.   Hopefully the next Head Coach is even better.  

And interestingly enough, if Rhule wasn't fired and the team finished the way some of the "draft gurus" here wanted, that would be the end of Sam as an NFL player, let alone QB in the league 'cause he wouldn't have gotten the chance Wilks and MacAdoo gave him that put him in the position to salvage his career as it turned out.  

 

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Front office did everything in their power to tank as much as was possible by trading CMC after Rhule’s firing. 

Wilks simply highlights how horrific Matt Rhule was a NFL HC.   Coaches and actual players aren’t going to tank and try to lose a game. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that losing games to move up in the draft is the only way to win later is such a brain dead line of thinking. 
 

the best qb in the game was drafted  10th overall by a team that went 12-4 the previous year and traded up to get him.  

Always win. 

Edited by CBDellinger
  • Pie 7
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. David Tepper set this team back doing all the wrong things at the wrong time. Wrong coach. Kept him on too long. Fired him too early in the season.

I can't blame Steve Wilks for making the most of what was given to him and getting more out of our talent than the previous guy. He lost players and coaches all season... and got guys to perform and made US keep watching. It's amazing how well a group of guys can do under different leadership. 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning against the Saints won't change our draft position much. Our strength of schedule is lower than any 7 win team so we pick before they do. We get a top 10 pick which will be 9th and we got to play meaningful games in December and January. Wilkes has done more for this franchise in 12 games than Rhule did since he got here. Anyone who see this as a setback has an agenda not based on facts.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...