Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In a deep qb class should the panther take one day 3?

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think so. We just drafted the wrong guy.

That's so convenient and easy to say in hindsight. 

If I were GM, I wouldn't have traded up, especially when 2024 was touted as being deep. It costs way too much to trade up from the ninth position to the first, especially when hitting on a QB is anything but guaranteed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Even if he is still super committed to Bryce the potential ROI on a late round QB that hits should be an easy sell to Tepper. Even if Bryce pans out if the late round QB shows promise you have a solid backup for minimal investment or you flip him for significantly more in trade value than what you spent to acquire him.

Yeah, that’s what I said… Rattler or Travis day three. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That's so convenient and easy to say in hindsight. 

If I were GM, I wouldn't have traded up, especially when 2024 was touted as being deep. It costs way too much to trade up from the ninth position to the first, especially when hitting on a QB is anything but guaranteed.

I agreed with the trade up. There was an opportunity there. There were three guys considered potential elite QB prospects. The #1 overall pick was available. We played much better down the stretch giving reasonable credence to the idea that with a legit QB and better coaching we were ready to make a leap. The opportunity to shoot our shot was there and we took it. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted

I here "it's a deep qb class" nearly every draft season.  The truth is that there is really only 1 that has a real chance of making it in the nfl each year, if that. Talent will only get you so far in this league. Coaching and system has a lot to do with player success.  The Panthers missed on all 3 last season. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
On 2/10/2024 at 1:58 PM, CPantherKing said:

Canales would work well developing Sam Hartman in a WCO system behind Bryce Young.

Yup, Hartman immediately jumped into my mind when I read the title.  Being that we are limited on picks and needing help everywhere, I really doubt a flyer pick will be considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MechaZain Grand Master

MechaZain

Posted
Posted

I don't like our odds of drafting a QB who will make an impact on day 3. Not when there are so many needs we could more easily address with that pick. 

The 1st pick in 2025 is what's TBD. Bryce is either going to make us competitive next year or put us in the spot to draft his replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Friday camp news and notes

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...